User talk:NaanReady

Welcome!
Hello, NaanReady, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Adnan ( ᵀᵃˡᵏ ) 07:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Leo (2023 Indian film)
Hey can you merge the first paragraph of the filming section with "The Kashmir schedule ended on 23 March.." Also just before this sentence can you add the part where Vijay shot a fight scene without a shirt. Some user removed it claiming it was unnecessary. Here it is: "Vijay shot a fight scene with only a simple shirt and had to roll on ice, despite the temperature being -20 °C.[1][2]" Then the next paragraph should start with "Lokesh, via Twitter.....". But can you remove the "via Twitter" part because it is unnecessary. 103.179.230.68 (talk) 15:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Also please remove this part from the lead section:"of Jil Jung Juk fame" 103.179.230.68 (talk) 15:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * That paragraph is about Kashmir schedule and cannot separate it with "Lokesh, via Twitter..." NaanReady (talk) 15:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I am saying that it would be better to have a separate paragraph for each schedule. So it can be kept organized. 103.179.230.68 (talk) 15:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Here are the citations for the part where Vijay shot a fight scene. 103.179.230.68 (talk) 15:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I have a new info: 103.179.230.68 (talk) 15:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Please add the fight scene in ice part. 103.179.230.68 (talk) 15:46, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Added. NaanReady (talk) 15:54, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The final schedule has not been finished and you have wrote in the filming section that 'The final schedule "was" shot...' Please change "was". 103.179.230.68 (talk) 00:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I got a source for the release section: 103.149.158.96 (talk) 16:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you atleast include this part in the lead section. The current one is not enough.
 * The official announcement for the film came in January 2023 with the tentative title Thalapathy 67, signifying Vijay's 67th film in the lead role, and the title Leo was announced few days after. The revelation regarding the principal cast and crew members took place within the same month. Principal photography took place the same year from early January to mid July, spanning a duration of 125 days, predominantly in Chennai and Kashmir with few portions in Kodaikanal, Talakona and Hyderabad. It has been made on an estimated budget of inr 2500000000–inr 3000000000, making Leo one of the most expensive Indian films till date. Anirudh Ravichander composed the film's soundtrack and background score, while Manoj Paramahamsa handled the cinematography, and Philomin Raj took care of the editing. 103.42.199.141 (talk) 02:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Removal of disputed tag
Hi, I noticed that you removed the disputed tag that I put in on the Adipurush article, which I had placed just after the budget statement. Note that the budget of this movie is disputed across several sources and articles. Do NOT remove the template again without discussing it on the article's talk page. Regards. aggarwala2727 (talk) 08:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Well done...
For trying to keep an eye on Leo (2023 Indian film). I've almost unwatched it due to people persistently adding unsourced info. Well done you. 👏 Knitsey (talk) 16:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Mashable source needs extra attention before citing
See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Mashable Cinephile4ever 14:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Leo lead section
Can you atleast include this part in the lead section. The current one is not enough.

The official announcement for the film came in January 2023 with the tentative title Thalapathy 67, signifying Vijay's 67th film in the lead role, and the title Leo was announced few days after. The revelation regarding the principal cast and crew members took place within the same month. Principal photography took place the same year from early January to mid July, spanning a duration of 125 days, predominantly in Chennai and Kashmir with few portions in Kodaikanal, Talakona and Hyderabad. It has been made on an estimated budget of inr 2500000000–inr 3000000000, making Leo one of the most expensive Indian films till date. Anirudh Ravichander composed the film's soundtrack and background score, while Manoj Paramahamsa handled the cinematography, and Philomin Raj took care of the editing. 103.42.199.141 (talk) 00:28, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Guntur Karam
Subject: Notice of Concern Regarding Your Wikipedia Contributions

Dear NaanReady,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to address some concerns regarding your recent contributions to Wikipedia. While we value the collaborative nature of our platform and appreciate your involvement, it has come to mine and certain others' attention that certain edits you have made may not align with Wikipedia's guidelines and standards.

Firstly I will go on to say I appreciate you taking out your time and helping the community by making various edits on various films and more. However, sadly the way most of your edits have been done and the changes to the articles are not the way they should be. Now, related to the changes I have made to the production. There is nothing false in what I have done in that section and everything has been fact proven, checked, and drafted in a formal way. If you were to disagree on anything you first need to advance to the talk page and sort the issue out with the user before just abruptly changing the edit and causing a conflict. Moving on to your versions. There is nothing wrong with the development point except one minor issue (Which I will address later on). Your version is too simplified version. There is no mention of any of the development hurdles the movie faced and so on. Here at Wikipedia, we ensure to thrive on the fact that we provide the most non-biased fair point of view to users without any filters and that's what's being done. Let it be ugly or good it has to be mentioned. The same applies to the cinematographer problem. The article you have clearly sources states due to "Creative Differences" but you have stated due to scheduling conflicts in the article which is completely false. Now secondly we don't add any description to the cast unless the movie is released or the production house gives a description to the cast member along with name. This is essential. Next you have added one of the lines as Few romantic scenes between Hegde and Babu were shot at Yashoda Hosptial,Hitech City in Hyderabad. Firstly these forms of lines are the most unnecessary lines that could be added. Production is for points such as when did it start, how long did it go for, schedule wraps etc. Not for unnecessary information like these, plus she had departed from the film making this completely redundant. Next please note that some of the sources you have claimed are not certified as per Wikipedia rules. Next coming onto the budget what? It is a claimed budget yes the publisher is a good but the ones they are claiming to get it from arent. Plus the movie is 5 months away and by then we will get a clear view on it. Dont add anything related to it unless we get a clear picture.

I hope rather than just throwing these important feedback away you rather use it to improve yourself as a editor and work on your style. I very much appreciate your contribution however it would be much better and sweeter if it were to come in positive way. Please note if repeated a warning could be issues if the senior editors agree.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. We hope to see you continue as a valuable contributor to Wikipedia's mission of providing accurate and reliable information to the world. And please note DO NOT REVERT WITHOUT DISCUSSING

Thank you, Regards, User: Repto79456‬
 * @User:Repto79456‬ News18 is reliable source that added in budget. NaanReady (talk) 13:22, 14 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Please check the source they had quoted. Repto79456 (talk) 05:37, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * As per WP:NFSOURCES all print medias or newspapers are reliable. So Siasat is also reliable. NaanReady (talk) 06:37, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Box Office
Hi, over the last few days, you have updated the box office gross of Jailer using reliable websites, but there is a problem. The websites that you used in your references use sacnilk.com as their reference which is considered to be unreliable as per WP:ICTFSOURCES. So even though the websites themselves are reliable, the numbers that they use from sacnilk is unreliable. So, when you add a reference from a website, try to check if their source for box office information is reliable. - Rajan51 (talk) 12:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Is Manobala Vijayabalan reliable source? NaanReady (talk) 12:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @Rajan51: Manobala Vijayabalan is unreliable per this discussion. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 13:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * In that case, we'll have to change to some other source that is actually reliable. The problem with the Indian box office is that there is no reliable source that tracks all Indian films or films in India. - Rajan51 (talk) 13:36, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @Rajan51 So we can use this source. I think it doesn't have any problem. NaanReady (talk) 14:06, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think that would be okay. - Rajan51 (talk) 14:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, just take a deeper look at the conclusion of this discussion, they conclude by saying manobala's figures are reliable and are not false.
 * @Rajan51
 * @NaanReady Kichawww (talk) 18:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @Kichawww: User:Ab207, User:SP013 said it is unreliable. But sock User:MovieBuffIndia only said it reliable. Means it is unreliable. No need to take sock blocked user's comments. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 02:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes maybe you're right. But still, the sock user's point stands. We might need some more discussion to prove manobala figures are incorrect and unreliable.
 * Thanks. Kichawww (talk) 08:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Sure. NaanReady (talk) 08:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @Kichawww: Sock blocked comments can't be considered. NaanReady (talk) 08:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Is that mentioned somewhere on Wikipedia's policies? Curious to know. Kichawww (talk) 13:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Post-production of Leo
I have found two sources about the post-production of Leo. Here they are: 103.179.230.134 (talk) 16:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Done. NaanReady (talk) 10:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 103.179.230.128 (talk) 01:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello
Hi, I just wanted to drop by and say you're doing a really good job expanding film articles such as Jawan. Just a note, a lot of PR fluff is published in Indian film-related sources. It's our job to disregard such content and focus on the ones that have encyclopaedic merit. Cheers! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Yeah! Focusing on it. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 09:49, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Box office
You may give your opinion too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Pathetic_box_office_reporting_of_Indian_films Cinephile4ever 15:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You maybe aware of this already, but please give CANVASS a read. From the discussion on the talk page between just the two of you, you seem to have established a consensus. It may edge into disruption and is not encouraged. Thanks and happy editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:52, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Kushi flop
Is Kushi actually a hit or a flop? Many sources report that it is a hit. Also after seeing the critics reviews from every websites the rating is more than 2 stars. There are no other sources rating less than that. Theoder2055 (talk) 16:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Theoder2055: Zee News stated the film loss over ₹12 crore in its final run. NaanReady (talk) 16:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Leo dancers' payment
Please see what you can add from this. Kailash29792 (talk)  08:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Kailash29792: RK Selvamani said payment was sent. But dancers says they didn't receive payment. NaanReady (talk) 15:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Please update this
If you can update the position of Avatar: The Way of Water as the "tenth" highest-grossing film in India, in the "overview" in List of highest-grossing films in India, that will be great of you. 103.73.183.130 (talk) 14:07, 14 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Already in the section. NaanReady (talk) 16:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Deva
Thanks for doing Edit Request. Please do this too. 103.161.55.118 (talk) 14:07, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Done. NaanReady (talk) 15:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Can you also add Deva in Director and Producer articles. There is Draft:Koi Shaq. Please cleanup it and move to article. 103.161.55.118 (talk) 15:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mrunal Thakur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nani. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Jomontgeorge. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC)