User talk:NancyPants

December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Brandi Glanville has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brandi Glanville was changed by NancyPants (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8729 on 2014-12-27T02:46:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:46, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brandi Glanville, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Haminoon (talk) 05:12, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, NancyPants. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Brandi Glanville, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Regards, Haminoon (talk) 05:35, 27 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Note -- NancyPants stated on Haminoon's Talk page that she works for Ms. Glanville. -- Ssilvers (talk) 09:18, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Brandi Glanville, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Haminoon (talk) 05:44, 27 December 2014 (UTC)


 * My editing updated an extremely outdated page with all fact, while you left text from gossip sites and personal information about living family members that should be private. [Added by NancyPants on 27 December 2014]


 * Nancy, please see my message at the bottom of this page. -- Ssilvers (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. The thread is Brandi Glanville. The discussion is about the topic Brandi Glanville. Thank you. Regards, Haminoon (talk) 05:52, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Talk page etiquette
Please don't delete material from my talk page. Regards, Haminoon (talk) 06:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Then why is their an edit option? That doesn't make any sense. I have added all of Glanville's current and recent projects and you have deleted them. [Added by NancyPants].


 * Hi, NancyPants. Please see my message below.  Haminoon is right, that we are not supposed to delete anything from another person's Talk page.  You can add messages to people's Talk pages, but please don't delete material from them. -- Ssilvers (talk) 09:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Advice
Several people have tried to tell you that do not know what you are doing, yet you are editing aggressively and not listening, and not asking questions. You are about an inch from getting banned for violating WP:COI, the Terms of Use, and several of our policies. For what it is worth, please read WP:COI carefully and reflect on how you have been editing. You should not be directly editing articles related to Glanville and you should be seeking WP:CONSENSUS (our foundational principle here - please read that link) for the changes you would like to see made. Editing Wikipedia is a privilege that is freely offered to all, but people who violate the Terms of Use, and our policies and guidelines lose their editing privileges. Good luck. Jytdog (talk) 06:33, 27 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The page requires updating. How about advice or even telling who or where to seek it? I tried reading but don't understand it. It's not user friendly. My concern is that it is currently very biased and outdated. As you can see, I don't even know how to find you to talk you, so I'm adding my message down here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NancyPants  (talk • contribs) 06:47, 27 December 2014‎ (UTC)


 * hm. aggressive response, and  you clearly didn't read the links I asked you to read... if you did read it and have questions, please feel free to ask them here.   I am trying to warn you; you are free to keep driving right over the cliff if you like!  It is your decision, completely - you can change, and start actually trying to understand the policies and guidelines here, or you can continue as you have been.  Good luck.  (and by the way I am watching this page, so I will see it, if you write anything here) Jytdog (talk) 06:59, 27 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Nancy. Instead of editing the article directly, you could write what edits you want and why you want them on the Talk:Brandi Glanville page. Be careful not to delete or overwrite anything already on the page. The subject's wishes are not always a good reason to remove material - a wikipedia entry is not a promotional press release. I noticed you mentioned on Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard that the entry contained defamatory material - you will need to be more specific if you want it removed. And please remember that Wikipedia is mainly put together by volunteers so please treat them respectfully. Regards, Haminoon (talk) 07:01, 27 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Jytdog and others, would you please give me a couple days to try to work with NancyPants to sort this out? She has asked me to "Adopt" her as a new user, and I will try to help her understand the policies and procedures so that appropriate improvements can be made to the Glanville article.  See my message to her below.  All the best!  -- Ssilvers (talk) 09:42, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Adoption request
Hello! I got your message, and I am here to help you! All the best. Talk to you tomorrow (Saturday), and we'll iron this out! -- Ssilvers (talk) 08:21, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * First of all, let me know your questions! If you have a lot of questions, why don't you start with a couple of the most important ones, and we'll go from there.
 * Second, having read the above, and some of what has been going on at the Brandi Glanville page, my first piece of advice is to slow down and take it step by step, so that we can understand what the problems are and how best to address them. We need to talk about it first and figure out what to do before making the changes to the Glanville article. We all want to get the facts right, and we can do that by finding and citing published news or magazine articles that contain the facts. But we can't make progress by fighting over the article with other Wikipedians -- we need to agree on changes first, and then I will be able to help you get the changes into the article so that they will stick and be acceptable to other Wikipedians.  I see that an editor above sent you too many links to read all at once, but it will be very helpful if you would read one important policy by clicking here.
 * Finally, whenever you write something on a Talk page, please sign your comment, so everyone knows who was speaking. You can do this automatically by adding four tildes after your comment, like this: ~