User talk:Narciso003

Reference errors on 2 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Caitriona Balfe page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=654634061 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F654634061%7CCaitriona Balfe%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Carmen Kass Prada Fall 2002.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madison Keys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birmingham Classic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2017
Your recent editing history at Roger Federer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:12, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Roger Federer. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''You were already warned about edit warring. I'd be careful before an administrator gets involved and sees your revert on the very day the page protection was lifted. You might want to self-revert'' Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

September 2017
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did  at Mike Cernovich, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You added "A convicted rapist" with this edit. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:54, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


 * , I'd be a little easier on this one. After all Cernovich was arrested for rape and then convicted of a lesser crime. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Aren't we meant to have inline citation for crimes in BLPs in the lead even if it is in the body? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 08:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. I agree with your revert. I'm just saying I think your warning was too harsh. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devon Aoki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yves Saint Laurent ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Devon_Aoki check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Devon_Aoki?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Great job! Observation
Hi Narcisso, you are doing a great job. I love tennis. Your edit on Weinstein, although I knew nothing about him until I saw you worked on it in your edit history.

I kinda googled "Weinstein democratic party" and found he is a politician. I don't know what you think. Danidamiobi (talk) 21:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Justin Gimelstob, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douchebag ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Justin_Gimelstob check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Justin_Gimelstob?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paulina Porizkova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estée Lauder. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katoucha Niane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yves Saint Laurent.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Venus Williams serving 2017 Wimbledon.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Venus Williams serving 2017 Wimbledon.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Carmen Kass 2011 2.png


The file File:Carmen Kass 2011 2.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused and unnecessary crop of File:Carmen Kass 2011.png."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Carmen Kass 2011 3.png


The file File:Carmen Kass 2011 3.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused and unnecessary crop of File:Carmen Kass 2011.png."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Carmen kass 2011 6.png


The file File:Carmen kass 2011 6.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused and unnecessary crop of File:Carmen Kass 2011.png."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)