User talk:Narendra PatelK

Feel free to give suggestions and point out mistakes, thank you. Narendra PatelK (talk) 00:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Hilsa, Bihar, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Why haven't you replied to me yet? Narendra PatelK (talk) 11:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello Yamaguchi先生, thanks for leaving this message, I have not added any original research to Hilsa, Bihar, I only edited out the communal inflammatory material and other irrelevant content. I continue to watch over that article and undo irrelevant edits/Vandalism. Furthermore - Hilsa is a small town in on of the poorest states of India and the local media operates in the Hindi language, so English sources are seldom available. You have erased the page completely, please undo your changes and restore the page to its previous version. Narendra PatelK (talk) 02:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Narendra, thank you for your message as well. The reason for receiving this notification is due to this edit  where you added or restored substantial unsourced content.  In accordance with Verifiability Policy, please refrain from adding content to any Wikipedia article without an accompanying reliable source.  Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022 sanction
Satnam2408 (talk) 08:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * What is this LMAO. I have no history of disruptions, Can you point to any past disruptive edits from my side?
 * I just scrolled through your contributions, you are a fairly new editor with few contributions who is obsessed with editing certain pages, you don't have the credibility to throw wiki community guideline templates here and there, better not do it next time without going through someone's contribution history.
 * I also scrolled through your talk page and found that you have hidden all the criticism coming your way Narendra PatelK (talk) 16:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)