User talk:Nations United

New question raised regarding Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/April 2015 move request
Some opposers of this move have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence", which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice
Please provide a reason within policy at Talk:Hillary_Clinton_presidential_campaign,_2016. User:Fred Bauder Talk 12:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

New Discussion (USPE, 2016)
Thank you for your participation in the discussion about the United States presidential election, 2016 candidate list organization. A new discussion has started here with other options for organizing the list of candidates. Please see if any of the new options are better than those available when you voted. --William S. Saturn (talk) 00:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

"Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016" revision 677101112 by Special:Contributions/Nations United
With regard to your edit-summary statement accompanying your 21 August 2015‎ revision #677101112 to "Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016", wherein you query: "Do you understand what NPOV means?" --- you may want to take a look in the mirror. The problem with understanding what NPOV means with respect to Clinton articles (based on a cursory look at your edit history of same) may not be with the rest of us. As John Henry Cardinal Newman wrote in his autobiography, "I looked in the mirror, and I was the monophysite." --- Professor JR (talk) 11:14, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Clinton photo
Hey, in the discussion page, everyone seemed to agree on the proposed photo, I think we should keep it, Clinton is looking at the camera and on the other photo she's not. Let's keep it. TexasMan34 (talk) 04:52, 1 August 2016 (UTC)