User talk:Nazar

Machine translation
This is a WP:3RR warning. Another editor and I have reverted your additions about ABBYY's upcoming product to machine translation. According to WP:BRD, it is your burden to bring the addition to the article's talk page and gain a consensus. Glrx (talk) 23:06, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Added to talk page there. Please kindly elaborate your concerns (in view of the refs provided). Thanks. -- Nazar (talk) 23:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You are engaging in an edit war by continually introducing Compreno in the machine translation article. Please revert your last edit. Glrx (talk) 21:46, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * New sources have been added. Related material has been presented on an international conference now. Please check the talk page. I'd also invoke Wikilawyering and kindly request you to avoid it. -- Nazar (talk) 19:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_125 - related RS/N discussion. -- Nazar (talk) 15:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Machine translation copyvio
Your addition to Machine translation has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Glrx (talk) 16:08, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Your recent editing history at Indigo children shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. SudoGhost 14:43, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review of Jainism
Hi, I have placed the article Jainism for peer-review. You might be interested in it. The link is here: Peer_review/Jainism/archive4. Cheers, Rahul Jain (talk) 07:18, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sudhir Shah


The article Sudhir Shah has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. nonsense ferret  15:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Lupe Fuentes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lupe Fuentes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lupe Fuentes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. j⚛e deckertalk 04:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Question.
Hi there. I'm not sure if this is the place to do this or not, if not, I guess you'll just delete this, but I was wondering if user talk pages are for wikipedia-related subjects, yet someone wants to talk to a user about personal matters such as their userboxes, how/where does one contact them? Thanks! Gaialpuig (talk) 19:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * How can I help you? Nazar (talk) 19:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Dandi Swami's Greek Version
What are your comments on Dandi Swami's Greek Version? Pankaj Jain 08:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capankajsmilyo (talk • contribs)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Nazar/Ethereal Beings
User:Nazar/Ethereal Beings, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nazar/Ethereal Beings and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Nazar/Ethereal Beings during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 22:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Zinovia Dushkova
Hi Nazar, why did you think the above articles tone wasnt right and it read like an advertisement? I have had a look at it, and it seems ok. It needs some fixes, but I cant see anything wrong with it. There might be something seriously wrong with it, and I can't see it. scope_creep (talk) 13:36, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi there! The advertisement tags were not put in by me. I find the article to be very solidly written. However, I've had experience with trying to write articles on similar topics on Wikipedia, a few years back, and found the general attitude of a number of very active reviewers to be prone to fault-finding and trying to eradicate the related information in a variety of ways (all of which were based on valid Wikipedia policies, of course). In my experience, articles on this topic come under quite a high level of scrutiny from the local skeptics, and trying to build them becomes a challenge. My suggestions about the article in question were only based on my feeling that a shorter, reserved and possibly most neutral exposure would save the trouble of arguing with certain type of local "vigilantes".
 * Regards, Nazar (talk) 18:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject:Ukraine

 * Thank you! Nazar (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Kozyrev mirror for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kozyrev mirror is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kozyrev mirror until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. BorgQueen (talk) 12:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)