User talk:Nedim Ardoğa/Archive 2

January 2010-June 2010

File:Akdeniz.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Akdeniz.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:File:Akdeniz
-  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 21:17, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Cut and paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a different title by copying its content and pasting it into. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. --Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Battles of Ramla
Nedim, those 3 battles are listed under Fatimid-Crusader War and except for the 3rd battle of Ramla had no Seljuk Turks involved. Instead of clearing the entire thing, change the heading Seljuk-Crusader War to Fatimid-Crusader War, if you like. :-D Do you think the 3rd battle should be left under the Seljuk-Crusader War heading? If not, I have no problems with it. Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

A question about the analytic solution for free fall time
The problem you referred to on the gravitational acceleration discussion page is known as "The Kepler problem for radial orbits". I recently solved this problem and it is now available at: Free fall --Norbeck (talk) 07:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

selam
Merhaba nedim kolay gelsin Kürşad maddesi için bu vikide kaynak girebilirmisin acaba?--Kamuran otukenli (talk) 09:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Bir de commonstan Göktürk bayrağını silmişler başka yükleyenler varmı bu konuda bana yardımcı olabilirmisin?--Kamuran otukenli (talk) 09:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * thank you very much,ama sanırım ben derdimi tam anlatamadım bu bayrağı sildireceklermiş wikipediadan çünkü kaynaksızmış bu konuda bir şeyler yapalım lütfen,kolay gelsin,have a nice day...--Kamuran otukenli (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Selamlar Nedim Göktürk bayrağını yine silmişler bu konuda yapabileceğimiz bir şey yokmudur?--Kamuran otukenli (talk) 21:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Hittite map
yes, all my sources for that map are listed on the image's page, apart from the main source which was the Kingdom of the Hittites book i also used: http://www.utexas.edu/courses/classicalarch/images1/Hittiterulemap.jpg http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/imperialism/maps/hittites.gif http://hittites.info/map.aspx#DisplayMap As well as various wikipedia pages to verify some city and place names. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Javierfv1212 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

"Sledgehammer" plot
Dear Mr.Ardoğa,

Since you are a Turkish speaker could you please add the interwiki of the article "Sledgehammer" plot which I have created to the respective Turkish Wikipedia article which I am sure alredy exists? I cannot do it since I do not know Turkish. Maybe you would also add some information to this article. Olegwiki (talk) 07:17, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Emblem
Hello! My understanding is that, due to the fair-use policy outlined by Non-free content criteria (namely, "Restrictions on location. Non-free content is allowed only in articles (not disambiguation pages), and only in article namespace"), it is impossible to use a non-free image (such as the METU emblem) in a userbox, and such uses are removed by an automatic system when encountered. I would suggest using a freely licensed photo (perhaps of the tree of science) for that purpose. Unfortunately, it seems like my "wikibreak" is going to last a bit longer than I anticipated. But I spared some time to do an overall improvement of the METU article. Regards, Atilim Gunes Baydin (talk) 00:36, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Turkmenistan
HI. They are all different settlements. However, as I lack district/local info, I am unable to distinguish and dab them all. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 13:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Ottoman history classification
Hi Nedim! By the modification of the said template, I was inspired from the Template:Sultans of the Ottoman Empire. I am not a historian, so I can say nothing about your recommendations. Please feel free to change the eras if you are sure. BTW, my appreciation for your efforts and contributions on Turkey-related articles. Cheers. CeeGee (talk) 21:21, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

D 400 highway
I noticed that you constructed a highway navigational template to be added to all cities. This IMO is not a good idea. These have the potential of proliferating to the extent of overwhelming the topic itself. There are hundreds of roads leading into Paris, for example! I would like to ask you to delete it and remove it from the articles. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 14:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree about Turkey, but these things will spread. Once started and allowed, some people working on highways will see that they proliferate. Proliferation is the problem, not Turkey or Nigeria. It's the G10 cities I'm worried about. Student7 (talk) 15:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

You might be interested
You might be intersted in participating in the article Genocide of Ottoman Turks and Muslims Hittit (talk) 13:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Kostantaniye
Hi Takabeg,

In English Wikipedia it is too difficult to keep the name İstanbul (or Istanbul) in history articles. Somebody changes it to Constantinople on the ground that İstanbul came to be used only after 1930. The only source for this claim is an ambigious circular of the Post Office to ban the address Constantinople in 1930. I am sure that by 1930, Constantinople (actually Kostantiniye) was already out of usage. But so far I couldn't find any on-line proof of this. Do you by any chance have any source to show when İstanbul bacame the name of the city ? Thanks. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Selam. Osmanlıda Konstantiniyye ve Dersaadet terimleri daha çok kullanılıyordu. Fakat İstanbul terimi de daha nadiren kullanılmış olsa da vardı. Açıkçası resmî olarak ne zaman değiştirildiğini bilmiyorum. Resmî belgelerde 1923 yılında İstanbul kullanılıyordu, herhalde. İstanbul şehremini mi yoksa Konstantiniyye şehremini mi kullanılyordu ? Buna da bakılması lazım. Takabeg (talk) 08:46, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Turkey
'Turkey' maddesine turk-dusmani ermeni ve yunan milliyetciler bize karsi"soykirim" propagandasiyapiyorlar. Silebelir mi? Tsk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.145.201.147 (talk) 23:06, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Ashina Jiesheshuai
Selam. Görüşmeyeli nasılsınız ? Türkçe Vikide Ashina Jiesheshuai ve Kür Şad maddeleri biraz geliştirildi ve bayağı kaynaklandırıldı. Maddedeki bilgilerin % 100'ü güvenilir kaynaklarla desteklenmektedir. Artık Böyle bir kişi yoktu, Böyle olay yoktu diyen de çıkmayacaktır :) Şimdi Kilibi Kağan'a geçtim. Gerç adının Kür Şad olmadığı da anlaşılıyor. Zaten Şad değildi. Ama dönemin ses değerlerine bakıldığında Jiesheshuai da kesinlikle değildir. Yani ne Kür Şad ne Jiesheshuai ne de Chieh-she-shuai. Yine de o zatın Türkçe adını gösteren bilimsel kaynaklar (bilimsel sayılmayan kaynaklar var da :)) olmadığı için kerhen Jiesheshuai tercih ediyoruz. Gerçek adını öğrenmek için kazı yaparak yeni bir Göktürk kitabesi filan çıkarımamız lazım olacak :) İngilizce Vikideki Ashina Jiesheshuai maddesi henüz zayıf. Vaktiniz olduğunda geliştirebilir misiniz ? Birde şunu soracaktım. Göktürk Kağanlığı maddesine unicode ile (&#x10C30;&#x10C3C;&#x10C08;&#x10C45; ekledim ama görünmedi. Mecburen /   şeklinde resim dosyaları ekledim. Unicode ile eklenen Old Turkic scriptin görünmesi için nelerin yapılması lazım ? Yardımcı olur musunuz ? Takabeg (talk) 04:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Ashina Jiesheshuai
Selamlar

Ashina Jiesheshuai maddesi güzel olmuş. Ellerinize sağlık. Ne yazık ki, Unicode konusunda yardımcı olacak kadar bilgim yok. Yalnız, Unicode ile yazılmış yazıyı okumak için okuyucu bilgisayarına da bu kodun önceden yüklenmiş olması gerektiğini sanıyorum. Bu sebepten Unicode ile yazılmış yazıları okuyucuların büyük bölümü zaten okuyamıyor. Belki de sizin düşündüğünüz gibi png format daha doğru olur. Öte yandan, yazıdaki şecere de ilgimi çekti. Bu şecere bu güne kadar gördüklerimden farklı. (Tabii bunda hakanların sık sık isim değiştirmelerinin de rolü olabilir.) Mesela Istemi ailesi Tardu’dan sonra yok. Hazar kağanlığı kurucusu sayılan Tong Yabgu’yu da göremedim. Selamlar.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 06:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Batı Göktürk kağanlarıyla henüz ilgilenemedim. Ondan Tardudan sonra yok. Zamanla halledecez. Göktürk kağanlar listesi de yarıda kaldı. Güzel kaynakları biliyorsanız tavsiye eder misiniz ? Yılmaz Öztuna'nınki iyi değil :) Görüşürüz. Takabeg (talk) 07:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Edirne incident
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Edirne incident, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ottomansouvenir.com/Capitals/Edirne.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:07, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

EMO
I created a page of a deceased EMO member, İbrahim Bilgen. I added the reaction of EMO to the event also. You may find the article interesting. Kavas (talk) 13:27, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
--EnderA (talk) 03:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Ahmed Riza
Hi Nedim, I took the license to merge Ahmet Riza into Ahmed Riza. Can you see if you can expand a little that article? It's a Turkish polymath and a very important character in the creation of the new Turkish state. Thank you and thank you for your very useful recent contributions! --SulmuesLet's talk 13:53, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the compliment. I'll see if I can contribute to the article Ahmed Riza. But as far as I can see, it is already a balanced summary. By the way, I couldn't understand why the title has been moved. The Arabic name is pronounced as Ahmad, but in Turkish (Ottoman and modern) words ending in d can't be pronounced and the letter d in the ending is transforned to t. So in Turkish there are no names with d ending. Well not very important, but I felt I have to remark. Have a nice day. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If that's the case, feel free to transfer everything to Ahmet and redirect the Ahmed. I think some expansion is really deserved by Riza, because he was a great personality at that time, DYK material for sure. Anyways wp:NODEADLINE. Bye. --SulmuesLet's talk 16:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 00:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Slm
Selam. Cevdet Kılıçlar maddesini birazcık zenginleştirmeye çalıştım. Ancak İngilizcem (de) iyidir. Maddeyi kontrol ederseniz sevineceğim. Takabeg (talk) 05:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Cicilian Gates
Thanks for the information. I will check it out. Warm regards John D. Croft (talk) 14:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Selam
Selam. Vaktiniz olduğunda Talk:Republic of Gumuljina sayfasına göz atar mısınız ? İyi çalışmalar. Takabeg (talk) 13:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Batı Hun
Selam. Nasılsınız ? Türkiye'de bazı devletlerin Türk devlet sayılması etnosentrik tarih anlayışı olarak yorumlanabilir. Fakat Batı Hun İmparatorluğunun durumu ayrıdır. Öyle bir ülke yoktur. Western Xiongnu ise başka bir ülkedir. Northern Xiongnu ve Southern Xiongnu'dan meydana gelen kimera gibi bir şeydir. Bariz hatadır ve criticism kavramına sağınamaz. Teşekkür ederim. İyi çalışmalar. Takabeg (talk) 04:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Seljuks of Turkey meselesi
Tekrar selam. Birde şunu söylemek istiyorum: Günümüz Türkiyesinde Anadolu Selçuklu Devleti olarak bilinen ülkenin adı Rûm Selçuk Sultanlığı idi. 1930'li yıllarda Anadolu Selçuklu Devleti adı icat edildi. Daha sonra İbrahim Kafesoğlu v.s. sentezcilerin öncülüğüyle Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti (Seljuks of Turkey) sokulmaya çalışıldı. Fakat Allah'a şükürler olsun, yerleştirilmedi. Hanedanın adı değil de Anadolu'daki Selçuklu toplulukları ifade etmek için Seljuk Turks, Seljuk in Anatolia, Seljuk of Anatolia terimlerinde sorun yoktur, bence. Fakat Anadolu Selçuklu Devleti ve Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti, tabi bunun İngilizce çevirleri bilimsel açıdan sorunludur. İyi çalışmalar. Takabeg (talk) 06:03, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Alp Er Tunga
Tekrar tekrar selam. Sizce bu doğru yönlendirme mi ? mystical heroes olarak kayda değerdir bence. Eğer kaynaklar isterlerse A, B. Daha vardır. Takabeg (talk) 07:15, 29 June 2010 (UTC)