User talk:NeoBatfreak/archive2

Edit summaries: Final request (lest you forget)
You have been asked multiple times by me and others to WRITE EDIT SUMMARIES:

Please, please, please leave edit summaries, at least on the Buffy pages, where some of us are actively editing. Thank you.--TEHodson 00:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Read "Edit Summary"
 * And start using them. Guessing at what you are doing is beyond frustrating.
 * - J Greb (talk) 06:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

If you do not start immediately writing edit summaries on the Buffy the Vampire Slayer pages, I will request that you be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I cannot understand why you refuse to follow any rules, no matter how simple they may be, but you are making yourself a colossal nuisance and making enemies as well. Why? How long does it take to type "Added image"? Do it or get off those pages I have anything to do with. If you can't follow even the most basic Wikipedia protocols, you don't belong here.

And for Christ's sake, set up an archive for this talk page. Thank you.--TEHodson 09:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * You appear to not understand the reason for archiving, either. It is not to get rid of current discussions, but old ones. I have restored the above warning, as I'm serious about it. Enough is enough.--TEHodson 20:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Copied from my talk page: I have archive my talk page, and its my first time too, and please don't bother me anymore, and I will try to remember to add edit summary on Buffy related pages and other unrelated articles, despites other users appear did the same thing too.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 20:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * This discussion was begun on your talk page, and should continue there. Please try to do things properly on Wikipedia.--TEHodson 20:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I am not "bothering" you; I am warning you. You've been here long enough to have learnt how things are done, you just simply refuse to do them properly no matter how many times you are asked. Edit summaries, regardless of other users' lapses, are a requirement. Do them or go edit someplace where no one cares. You shouldn't have to "remember" them, any more than you should have to "remember" your own name.--TEHodson 20:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * LEAVE ME ALONE, OR I'll tell the administrators for harrasments!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--NeoBatfreak (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Be my guest. It is you who is not following rules on Wikipedia. If you wish to call attention to the problem yourself, it would be one less thing for me to deal with. Leaving you requests and warning you that I'm about to ask for a block based on your blatant violation of Wikipedia policy is not improper. I am following protocol; you are not. By all means, report this.--TEHodson 20:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Leave me alone, you are acting like high school kid.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--NeoBatfreak (talk) 20:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Where does it say that edit summaries are a requirement? It does not. They are highly recommended. If this editor is not engaging in disruptive editing in the first place, you have no right to demand that s/he use summaries. A request is simple enough, but you are going beyond the boundaries of WP:CIVIL and threatening a block that will not happen if his/her only offense is this. Elizium23 (talk) 20:23, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * His refusal to leave edit summaries on long chains of edits is driving everyone who deals with him nuts. It is extremely disruptive to the process of working on pages that are being upgraded, rewritten, etc. It's a simple enough thing to do, and he's been asked here by others as well as me, on the talk pages of articles he's worked on, and he just won't do it. Maybe requesting a block is too much, but there is a long history here of other, more disruptive behaviors by this user that he is not responsive to requests to change, either. He's not a newbie, but his behavior on WP is that of a perpetual new-comer who hasn't read even one sentence of how things are done here, and frankly, I'm out of ideas to get him to improve. What would you suggest?--TEHodson 20:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Another discussion from my talk page, after multiple problems and near despair:

I'm not great with grammar That is the problem I have since childhood. It is my learning disability and have to get myself some writing tutors thoughout school.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 18:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * If basic writing skills are a problem, you should not be writing on an encyclopedia. I don't mean to be harsh, but being able to write is a minimum requirement here at Wikipedia. I beg you to stop--you are creating tons of unnecessary work for me and the others who follow you around, cleaning up after you. At least stop of the Buffy pages, which are in enough trouble without people making them worse. I have had to rewrite or revert dozens of your edits already. Please, please stop. And please leave replies to messages on your Talk page on your Talk page, not mine, so that conversations make sense--can you see that at the top of this page it tells you that if I've left a message on your page, answer there?--TEHodson 18:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Fine, I'll just stick with uploading screen captures then. Angel episodes needs some images to illustrate.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 18:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * TEHodson, LEAVE ME ALONE, and you've just read what Elizium23 had wrote. I did not violate the Wikipedia's policy, just didn't do what they recommend.  If you didn't stop harrassing me, I will tell the administrators to block you and J Greb from my talk page!!!!!!!!!!!!