User talk:NeoRetro

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

You say all these nice things here but on the edit page you start wıth Ugghh and state that endless stream of Fener fans are trying to mess up tha page. Plase check the version before mine and see who is really trying to mess up the pages.

Also, if it is not too much trouble for you also check the article 1461 Trabzon and also look for the version before mine and see who is really attacking who.

Thanks for your understanding and time and please let me know what you feel. I am really curious.Rivaner (talk) 11:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Curious about what? I couldn't find any edits you made to 1461 Trabzon... Now I'm curious too, lol. Why dit you start off with going to the DR/N ? I didn't revert any of your edits! And even after some other fenerbahce fan (? not you) deleted the entire segment, I haven't even tried to put it back up because I'm not interested in having a fight with anyone about unimportant stuff. And no, we don't know the final verdict. He still has one more appeal left as far as I know. But feel free to write whatever you want. I'm not going to remove it, I didn't in the first place and I have no intentions of doing so.NeoRetro (talk) 00:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1461_Trabzon&action=history In this link you can find the edits made in the 1461 Trabzon page. In case you missed on my signature, my nickname is Rivaner. It is the 8th edit from the top. Now that hopefully ends your curiousty about the 1461 Trabzon article, let's get back to your "not wanting to fight" good wishes. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trabzonspor&diff=582788393&oldid=582118436 In this link you can see my version and your version. Now, be honest and tell me which one is more offensive and incriminating? You were writing these things well before the courts gave their final verdict. What happened to presumption of innocence? Let me know and also thanks for letting me write "whatever" I want.Rivaner (talk) 17:21, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Trabzonspor and 1461 Trabzon Articles". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 07:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Hagia Sophia
Hi! Could you provide a source for this change? Regards, Alæxis¿question? 09:32, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I will look into it this weekend.NeoRetro (talk) 12:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demographics of the Netherlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trabzon Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hittite. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. Your recent edit to the page Religion in the Netherlands appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pontic Greek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Köprübaşı. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

CBS data - you were right
My apologies, your edits were correct. I read them too quickly and given the complexity of the CBS definition I initially misread them. Thanks for letting me know. Best Arnoutf (talk) 18:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! The definition is a bureaucratic monstrosity. :/ NeoRetro (talk) 21:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)