User talk:Nguyen280405

November 2023
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Aoi Yūki, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 18:59, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tokyo Disneyland. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. WJ94 (talk) 13:24, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tokyo DisneySea, you may be blocked from editing. WJ94 (talk) 13:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tokyo Disneyland. WJ94 (talk) 13:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * the source said it was oriental land. do you have eyes Nguyen280405 (talk) 13:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Nguyen280405, I hope you are well. Another user has just left me a message informing me that I was wrong to revert these edits of yours and leave you these warnings - having looked at it myself, I see that they are absolutely right. I just wanted to apologise for this - I honestly but incorrectly assumed these edits to be vandalism but should have taken greater care when reverting. WJ94 (talk) 10:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Allies of World War I
You need to open a discussion at Talk:Allies of World War I about the article name. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 20:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

"Alliedpower" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alliedpower&redirect=no Alliedpower] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Authoritarianism
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Authoritarianism, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Nguyen280405&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1197747597 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Authoritarianism&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1197747597%7CAuthoritarianism%5D%5D Ask for help])

January 2024
Hello, I'm Broc. I noticed that you recently removed content from Timeline of space exploration without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Broc (talk) 11:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of space exploration, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please indicate why the information is "false", as it is supported by a reliable source. Broc (talk) 11:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Synorem. I noticed that in this edit to Space Race, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I explain "as below" Nguyen280405 (talk) 14:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * "as below" is not a valid reason to remove large portions of text. Synorem (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prehistoric sites in Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paeonia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Robert Walpole
Hello. In your revert to Walpole's start of term as British PM to 3 April 1721, you say "the article itself says 3 April with source from nationzl archive while the 4 april date is claimed without source".

Which article? The First Lord of the Treasury article? Well, it does now, after you changed it. In your change, you say "see sir robert walpole". That sounds an awful lot like circular logic (or circular referencing) to me, and Wikipedia cannot be source to itself. You also changed his predecessor's article ("see sir robert walpole").

I'm all for consistency, but which is the actual source? I can't find a National Archives source in any of the articles.

Cheers. HandsomeFella (talk) 13:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * sir robert walpole, 40th source, in the rise to power and decline section Nguyen280405 (talk) 13:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. HandsomeFella (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)