User talk:Nhradek

Welcome!
  Hello, Nhradek!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, -- dsprc   [talk]  10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Precognition
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia.

I've noticed your recent contributions and I'd like to offer some perspective. While Wikipedia has a multitude of experienced editors, it doesn't necessarily mean they are infallible. That said, the likelihood of them collectively acting in bad faith to hinder the dissemination of knowledge is quite minimal.

I understand your perspective on the Precognition topic, especially regarding the citation of Bem's papers. However, there are several editorial policies on Wikipedia that guide such decisions. The intricacies of these policies and their influence on content can be complex, especially for those who are new to the platform.

As a newcomer, you might find it challenging to navigate these policies without a deeper understanding of how Wikipedia operates. Therefore, I'd suggest starting with editing some uncontroversial articles. This will give you a hands-on experience of Wikipedia's workings and its community dynamics. Once you're more familiar with the platform and its guidelines, you'll be in a better position to engage in more contentious topics.

Lastly, I'd like to introduce you to a principle that might be of interest: WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. It's a reminder that while Wikipedia is a platform for knowledge, it's not always the place to right every perceived wrong. Sometimes, understanding and working within the system can lead to more productive outcomes. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The likelihood that Bem, Tressoldi and others are acting in bad faith is incorrect too. Multiple editors have acted in bad faith. I can quote if you wish. Nhradek (talk) 19:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * What editorial decisions? You can't cite them. Nhradek (talk) 19:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Nhradek. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)