User talk:Nicolerichiefan

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.

October 2007
Please don't post unsubstantiated and unverifiable rumors about the winner of America's Next Top Model, Cycle 9. Thanks. Eatcacti 18:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ''Specifically, stop messing up the call-out table. '' &mdash;dgies tc 21:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

--LeyteWolfer 17:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC) (talk

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eatcacti (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Eatcacti (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. .  Eatcacti (talk) 20:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Nik Pace
A tag has been placed on Nik Pace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Merenta (talk) 20:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

November 2007
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Eatcacti (talk) 06:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Seriously, could you please stop inserting false information into the call-out order? Why do you keep doing this? Eatcacti (talk) 06:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Eatcacti (talk) 06:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Could you please discuss your edits on the America's Next Top Model/America's Next Top Model, Cycle 9 talk pages before making them? It's obvious that most editors disagree with them because they keep getting changed back, and not just by me. What you are doing is edit warring, and if you continue, I will report you (again). Please just be reasonable and discuss your edits first or preferably stop making them altogether. Eatcacti (talk) 20:07, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to America's Next Top Model, Cycle 9, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sireafi (talk) 20:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Eatcacti (talk) 21:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Please discuss your edits -- see how to use a talk page, if you need help. Since you've continued reverting, instead of joining or even responding to these many pleas and warnings, and due to recent blocks in the past, I've blocked your account from editing for 72 hours, or until you respond to this message and agree to use talk pages, in the future. Consensus and dispute resolution are important. – Luna Santin  (talk) 03:36, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Lisa/Saleisha Surnames
In the article for Cycle 9 of America's Next Top Model, please refrain from putting down Lisa's surname as Cosse and Saleisha's as Cooper. Those are false surnames submitted my vandals when the contestants were first revealed. IMDB and Poptower.com are not reliable sources as they rely on user-submitted information, which is often first found here. The other girls were also given such surnames but ALL have since been proven wrong. --4.241.33.188 (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Eatcacti (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Why did you remove ZephyrWind's cleaning up on America's Next Top Model, Cycle 9? ZephyrWind has done an excellent job of cleaning up articles and you undid ZephyrWind's edits and replaced it with your unnecessary, excess information. Please do not do this again because I've seen you do this before. Also, Heather has been confirmed by Chantal that it is her first name. Chantal is a "nickname". Please view the talk page of the article, aka "discussion" to view the interview where she confirmed it. Sireafi (talk) 03:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

April 2008
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Sireafi (talk) 23:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Onorem♠Dil 13:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)