User talk:Nights At Nyte

October 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Hater (Korn song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Nu metal
The edits you made really weren't necessary at all. First off, many of the nu metal-influenced bands of the 2010s are metalcore, not just deathcore (this is sourced). As a compromise, I already kept some info you added onto the article but restored some of the stuff you removed. Don't remove sourced content. You can add some content as long as you have some good sources. But don't remove content that's already sourced. If you really feel there's something about the nu metal article that must be removed or something, then please tell me first. I am open to discussing things with you. Statik N (talk) 20:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

, I am convinced he firmly believes that the deathcore and metalcore paragraphs should be separated, whereas you do not. This is what I believe happened in the last few edits. The sourced material he removed was mostly covered in the following paragraph.  danny music editor  ~talk to me!~ 22:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of artists who reached number one on the Billboard Hot Rock Songs chart


The article List of artists who reached number one on the Billboard Hot Rock Songs chart has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Disambiguation link notification for February 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Through It All, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital Download. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Prophets of Rage, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you.  Rob van  vee  13:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to System of a Down, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Mlpearc ( open channel ) 23:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Lips of an Angel, you may be blocked from editing. Mlpearc ( open channel ) 23:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Issues (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HBO Max, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages TBS and HLN ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/HBO_Max check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/HBO_Max?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HBO Max, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/HBO_Max check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/HBO_Max?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Summer Camp Island
I don't understand what you are trying to say. The content was removed because the reference was a tweet. What you are saying has no bearing on that. Drmies (talk) 21:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Summer Camp Island; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 23:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 23:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Simmerdon3448. Thank you. The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 02:58, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Summer Camp Island
Regarding your edit at Template:HBO Max, there is currently a talk page discussion over at Talk:Summer Camp Island. I suggest you go there instead of re-instating the contested material. The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 20:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Template:HBO Max; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''Look, I pointed you to a talk page discussion on this matter. I don't want a repeat of last time. Please go to Talk:Summer Camp Island and get consensus before you reinstate the contested material.'' The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 20:43, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fungies! (December 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Fungies! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Fungies!, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Fungies! Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Fungies! reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:35, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Template:HBO Max, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 16:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Template:HBO Max, you may be blocked from editing. If it's not a continuation, then it should go under "Upcoming original series", not excised from the article completely. The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 20:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Template:HBO Max. The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 14:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Dude, the page for The Boondocks was made into a redirect to the episodes page. It's completely pointless to have the series on there right now. Nights At Nyte (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You've removed it from the template completely in the past for invalid reasons. It's completely pointless to remove the series from there. Drop the stick. The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 20:15, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Craftopia (May 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Craftopia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Craftopia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Craftopia Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Craftopia reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:26, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Craftopia (May 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Craftopia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Craftopia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Craftopia Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Craftopia reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Miniseries
Put the section back. You called for a poll and you’re not even allowing any contest? That’s is beyond unfair and not in the spirit of discussion. Rusted AutoParts 20:50, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

What's beyond unfair is you and only you trying to force this, when no one else supports it, and it doesn't even make sense. Look at the other streamers. They don't need a Miniseries section. Only baseline HBO has one, and it doesn't have tables. In other words, it needs a section to indicate that. I'm not arguing against contest, as you say, I'm removing the section until further notice. If more people come in and argue in favor of it, then sure, restore it. But really, it has no reason to be there and should've been reverted ages ago, so I'm doing it unless more people besides you want it that way. Again, you're mostly good at what you add and helpful. But this just isn't it. Nights At Nyte (talk) 20:54, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It isn’t unfair at all of me to put the section back when it’s still being debated whether it should be removed or not. That is not how a discussion works. The thing is question is whether to remove the section. You can’t remove the section before anyone even gets a chance to get their two cents in if they disagree, especially when your last comment was essentially “any objections?” I object yet you persist in keeping it gone. Please readd it until other voices are heard. Rusted AutoParts  21:00, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of HBO Max original programming; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- / Alex /21  01:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Concern regarding Draft:Untitled Ivanka Trump series
Hello, Nights At Nyte. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Untitled Ivanka Trump series, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 04:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Untitled Ivanka Trump series


Hello, Nights At Nyte. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Untitled Ivanka Trump series".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:33, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Uncited material: Shi (comics) and Brian Pulido
Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit Shi, as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. I know you don't edit here that often, but since you've accumulated over 960 edits since 2015, you may have learned that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which editors learn to make here. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Please do not add uncited or poorly cited material to articles, as you did with this edit to Brian Pulido, as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable secondary sources, and that citations of those sources be placed after the supported material. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Point Horror (TV series)


Hello, Nights At Nyte. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Point Horror".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  00:08, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Vegas High
Hello, Nights At Nyte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vegas High, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:All Caps Comics
Hello, Nights At Nyte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:All Caps Comics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:All Caps Comics


Hello, Nights At Nyte. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "All Caps Comics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Artists Elite Comics
Hello, Nights At Nyte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Artists Elite Comics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Artists Elite Comics


Hello, Nights At Nyte. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Artists Elite Comics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

September 2023
Your recent editing history at Soviet–Afghan War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Loafiewa (talk) 00:36, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)