User talk:Nikolas Ojala

February 2014
Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Eugenics, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD (talk) 21:27, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flathead engine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knocking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mean Length Turn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coil. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

About using my talk page as a media for some theories
Recently one IP-user has repeatedly flooded this talk page with his theories. It was not worst that he did it in Finnish language, although it was also strange. This is English Wikipedia. after all. But worse was that he used this talk page to publish his thoughts about a subject that simply does not belong in this talk page. If you read this, stop that behavior immediately! Thank you and have a nice spring. ––Nikolas Ojala (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey Nikkie you're so fine! You're so fine you blow my mind! Hey Nikkie! Hey, Hey, Hey Nikkie!
--Brustopher (talk) 19:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

RSN discussion
I have brought up Barnes Review at RSN here Reliable sources/Noticeboard. As I said there, I'm particularly concerned that you would think Barnes Review would be an acceptable source to comment on anything other than non contentious claims about people involved on it. At most, if their commentary is significant i.e. mentioned in one or probably more reliable third party sources, it should be mentioned as their view (either Barnes Review or the author) that received attention rather than a 'Nationalist' view. (Nationalist is a very unclear description.) But to be clear, they cover such a fringe view point that there's no way they should be mentioned unless other sources have noticed and commented on their commentary. This is how WP:RS and WP:NPOV is supposed to work and I really think you need to re-read them and related policies and guidelines if you think they're generally an acceptable source for non-fringe viewpoints. Nil Einne (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Infinite torque at zero rpm
Redirects are ineligible for proposed deletion. I've moved it to redirects for discussion for you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:03, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Don't restore forum rants to talkpages, they're solely for specific, constructive recommendations for article improvement.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:04, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)