User talk:Nilheda

I have moved your article about Adan River to Adan River, rather than calling it Article start. Welcome to Wikipedia! &mdash; Tivedshambo (talk to me/look at me/ignore me) 16:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

List of fishes of Pune district
I moved the article and reformatted the contents. It also needs references to be cited. Let me know if you need any help. Shyamal 13:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Fresh Water Ecology of Maharashtra
Hi Nilheda,

Your article on the Fresh Water Ecology of Maharashtra is becoming quite impressive in terms of its content. I have put some comments on the discussion page; Please feel free to discuss these, and to ask for assistance where needed.

Best regards

--Slashme 08:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much Shamal. --Nilheda 09:56, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You probably meant to reply in the earlier section. You can indent your replies using colons at the start of the line. The previous comments are by a different user. Also you may like to interact with and join the Fishes wikiproject. Some of the article title you have used as well as the style of writing may need to be changed to keep the encyclopaedic tone. You can see more on this here at WP:MOS. Let me know if you need any more help on this. Keep up the good work. Shyamal 10:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Nilheda,
 * I'm glad you found my comments useful. Don't hesitate to contact me (or of course any of the other friendly Wikipedia folks, like Shyamal) if you have any questions.  For someone who is new to editing Wikipedia, you're doing very well.  It's important that people who have specialist knowledge contribute to Wikipedia, and you appear to be a specialist in a number of areas.  It's also important that we make the Wikipedia project as a whole an international one, so those of us who speak more than one language are crucial to communication between the different Wikipedia projects. --Slashme 10:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

India quick links
utcursch | talk 09:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Fish Experts of Maharashtra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Julius Sahara 15:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Natural lentic water bodies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Julius Sahara 15:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Avoiding deletion during creation
One approach is to create articles in your user space such as /Natural lentic water bodies and move them to the main space once you are comfortable that the article conforms to the requirements of wikipedia by way of style and content verifiability. Shyamal 15:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Dhir.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:367R23P8Dhir.jpg. The copy called Image:367R23P8Dhir.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 04:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

How to improve your article on the freshwater ecology of Maharashtra
Hi Nilheda,

The style of this article still needs some work to match the rest of Wikipedia.

Here is some (hopefully constructive) criticism to help you get there:

In your opening section, you say: The state of Maharashtra in India has several river major river systems including those of the Narmada, Tapti, Godavari and Krishna rivers. The ecology of these rivers and associated wetlands is covered in this article. Introduction: Ecology is the science of interrelationship. Various components of the ecosystem interact together and thus maintain the proper ecosystem functioning. To create the holistic picture of the any given area one should have to consider various components of the ecosystem. These components could be Habitats (Land and Waterscapes), Species, people/institutions, people’s various practices, their various aspirations and issues ecological history etc. Here an attempt has been made to create a rather holistic picture of the fresh water ecological scenario of Maharashtra state. Maharashtra is well known for its varied biodiversity, habitat diversity, people and culture etc. In this page we are trying to put all available information regarding fresh water ecology of the Maharashtra region. The political boundary of Maharashtra is chosen only to facilitate the systematic data compilation. More Specifically in terms of river basins Narmada, Tapti, Godavari and Krishna basin is the premise of the information. Following components are selected for the compilation of the whole data. You should not have to say "X is covered in this article". This is good and necessary in academic papers, where you explicitly define the scope of the article in the abstract, but is not standard in encyclopedia articles.

You also do not have to say "Introduction" before you introduce the topic. It is assumed that your opening section is the introduction.

Look out for "etc.", as it leaves the reader wondering "and what else?".

I like the new pictures that you have added. They are good illustrations of the topic.

You have a number of sections that are very necessary in a thesis, but should not be in the article. The "Chemistry of fishes" section is a good example. In any case, I suggest that you remove all the empty sections until such time as you are ready to add text to them.

I have commented out some text in the "list of freshwater fishes" section, please see what I wrote there.

I see your "fish experts of Maharashtra" article has been removed. If you need help getting it into a state where it can go back, please ask me.

Remember to change any wikilinked section headings into normal text, and to add the "main" tag to redirect the user to a main article on the topic. You will see that I have already done that in a few places.

Take a look at the Climate of India article. It's a featured article, and should give you some good pointers on style and formatting.

Lastly, let me just thank you for your contributions so far. I think you're adding significant value to the project, and I hope I'm not bombarding you with too much criticism, advice and information too fast.

Best regards, --Slashme 06:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Dear Slashme, Thanks a lot for this detailed guidance. As this is my starting I trying my best to learn the WIKI culture. I will definitely improve the content.


 * OK, I'm glad to see that you're back! Let me know if you have any questions. --Slashme (talk) 12:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Missing references
Hi Nilheda. Some time ago you started an article on fishing techniques. The introduction section contains a lot of very useful snippets on the history of fishing. However, I think you may have forgotten to complete citing your sources. For example, you give references such as "(Parker 2002)", but then omit to say what the Parker article was. Is it possible for you to supply those references now? It would be much appreciated. --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Freshwater Fishes of Central India
A tag has been placed on Freshwater Fishes of Central India, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Freshwater Fishes of Central India and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Traditional conservation practices in India


The article Traditional conservation practices in India has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This poorly sourced article appears to be a term paper. It is impossible to develop the article because the meaning is unknown.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Diannaa (Talk) 04:50, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Map Adan for WIKIPADIA.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Map Adan for WIKIPADIA.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Man-made lentic water bodies of Maharashtra for deletion
The article Man-made lentic water bodies of Maharashtra is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Man-made lentic water bodies of Maharashtra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Traditional knowledge about natural history of fishes


The article Traditional knowledge about natural history of fishes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * If this has been published before it is nearly certainly a copyright violation (although I couldn't find the source), if not then it's original research. Also not sure it's an appropiate topic for an encyclopedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dpmuk (talk) 13:30, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Adan India.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:29, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Adan river, Maharashtra, India (11 October, 2005).jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Adan nil.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:28, 11 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Bhoi.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:18, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

File:RISHI LAKE KARANJA.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RISHI LAKE KARANJA.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 21:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fish research institutions in the Maharashtra


The article Fish research institutions in the Maharashtra has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJayWhat did I do? 03:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Bembla river moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bembla river, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 13:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bembla river
Hello, Nilheda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bembla river, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2022 (UTC)