User talk:NinjaWeeb

Welcome
Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to drop me a message here :)

Citation needed tag on Tomás Yepes
Hello NinjaWeeb, I just wanted to inform you that I have removed the tag you placed. Per MOS:CITELEAD, a Lead doesn't require in-line references as long as its content is covered and cited in the prose; because a Lead is just a summary of the rest of the article. Thank you for edits. — The Most Comfortable Chair 11:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I'll make sure not add tags to Leads in the future. Thank you.

NinjaWeeb (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom case
Hi. I've reverted your addition to the ArbCom case page, as the "Accept/Decline" thing is for arbitrators only. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

OK. Apologies NinjaWeeb (talk) 14:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

plants!
Hiya NinjaWeeb, another plant nerd here. I saw your recent work and started a discussion here. If you're looking for plants to write about, by the way, we have an enormous list of genera that need an article at WikiProject Plants, and I also just realised most endangered European plant species lack articles (Habitats Directive). Cheers! Leo Breman (talk) 15:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello . Thanks! I will have a look at this list! NinjaWeeb (talk) 15:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Just had a look at your new page. It's good! Thanks for helping with this... someone calculated it would take to 2025 to finish that list. Regards, Leo Breman (talk) 21:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks ! I'm thinking about creating a script which would make creating stub-level pages much quicker. NinjaWeeb (talk) 22:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Oo, I don't know much about scripts. There are rules for implementation... Maybe ask at the WikiProject Plants before doing anything drastic? A few people over there are much more knowledgable than I when it comes to such things. Leo Breman (talk) 22:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)


 * . I'll do that first, NinjaWeeb (talk) 22:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Trading212 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trading212 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Trading212 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  scope_creep Talk  16:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The logo of the stockbroker Trading212.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The logo of the stockbroker Trading212.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Aglaonema nebulosum.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aglaonema nebulosum.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Allium akerense.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Allium akerense.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Allium sannineum.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Allium sannineum.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 22:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Image licensing
I've tagged the plant images you've uploaded for deletion. For non-free content, the image must satisfy all of the non-free content criteria. You've provided no explanation as to why a free image could not be created for the plant (WP:NFCC). For the other two images, you've stated they are CC-BY-4.0 but the source page for each indicate that it is CC BY-NC 4.0. The difference is important. Wikipedia requires that commercial use be allowed. the NC (non-commercial) restriction on these licenses are not acceptable and CC-BY-40 is not the sme as CC-BY-NC-4.0. If you have questions about media and copyright on Wikipedia, a good place to post is Media Copyright Questions. -- Whpq (talk) 22:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1º, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Teucrium "ackermannii"
It is best not to create articles on plants such as Teucrium ackermannii that don't have entries in the major databases. There are many erroneous and misspelled "species" in the RHS listings. If you are looking for species that are important but don't have an article, these are the ones listed on User:Pengo/missing plants that are accepted by POWO; Spartina townsendii, Phragmites karka, Stylosanthes hamata, Stylosanthes guianensis, Nemesia strumosa, Lemna perpusilla, Rottboellia exaltata, Desmodium uncinatum, Rosa hybrida, Tylophora indica, Koenigia islandica, Gliricidia maculata, Anabasis aphylla, Sorghum almum, Nicotiana debneyi, Chloris barbata, Smilax officinalis, Erysimum asperum, Poa arctica, Erythrina suberosa, Oenothera organensis, Solanum berthaultii, Coptis japonica, Ardisia crispa, Mansonia altissima, Rhododendron campanulatum, Euphorbia neriifolia, Atriplex spongiosa, Beaumontia grandiflora, Sprekelia formosissima, Attalea funifera, Calligonum comosum, Vicia narbonensis, Stylosanthes gracilis, Anchusa capensis, Capparis sepiaria, Chrysopogon fulvus, Genista hispanica, Vicia graminea, Indigofera hirsuta, Grewia flava, Ornithopus sativus, Pterocarpus officinalis, Vicia hajastana, Grewia bicolor, Aglaonema commutatum, Solanum acaule, Ephedra equisetina, Grewia flavescens, Mikania cordata, Spiraea vanhouttei, Euphorbia caducifolia, Lumnitzera littorea, Piptadeniastrum africanum, Pentaclethra macrophylla, Cynodon plectostachyus, Grewia optiva, Desmodium tortuosum, Aristida longiseta, Eragrostis ciliaris, Erythrina corallodendron, Phippsia algida, Dioscorea floribunda, Ophioglossum reticulatum, Aristolochia fangchi, Artemisia monosperma, Euphorbia thymifolia, Eperua falcata, Petunia inflata, Freesia refracta, Moricandia arvensis, Artemisia capillaris, Forsythia ovata, Rhododendron anthopogon, Marsilea vestita, Indigofera cordifolia, Pluchea lanceolata, Draba alpina, Sorghum arundinaceum, Shorea assamica, Colchicum luteum, Entandrophragma angolense, Luehea seemannii, Phragmites mauritianus, Stylosanthes scabra, Aegialitis annulata, Cynodon nlemfuensis, Calamus draco, Macroptilium lathyroides, Arctagrostis latifolia, Polygonatum pubescens, Drymaria cordata, Castanopsis tribuloides, Lygodesmia juncea, Sphagnum imbricatum, Echinochloa polystachya, Mitragyna stipulosa, Nicotiana paniculata, Berberis lycium, Grewia oppositifolia, Solanum commersonii, Cardamine bellidifolia, Chelone lyonii, Machilus thunbergii, Pueraria javanica, Nigella arvensis, Indigofera spicata, Astrocaryum mexicanum, Kirkia acuminata, Pyrethrum roseum, Copaifera officinalis, Angelica glauca, Astragalus racemosus, Atractylodes macrocephala, Waldsteinia ternata, Myricaria germanica, Phleum arenarium, Aconitum carmichaeli, Incarvillea delavayi, Nitraria schoberi, Salicornia fruticosa, Cotoneaster simonsii, Salicornia rubra, Syringa chinensis, Hemarthria altissima, Phytolacca acinosa, Calycophyllum candidissimum, Combretum zeyheri, Pityrogramma calomelanos, Verbena tenuisecta, Casearia tomentosa, Sterculia setigera, Tylophora asthmatica, Leucaena diversifolia, Euphorbia nivulia, Dioclea megacarpa, Lythrum virgatum, Campanula aparinoides, Indigofera linifolia, Morina longifolia, Oenothera tetragona, Raoulia australis, Rosa webbiana, Alchemilla arvensis, Lupinus subcarnosus, Spiraea betulifolia, Blumea lacera, Eragrostis eriopoda, Neonotonia wightii and Potentilla aurea. Abductive (reasoning) 03:52, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I'll keep a note of this in the future :] NinjaWeeb (talk) 22:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of philosophers of religion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vladimir Solovyov and Brian Davies.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)