User talk:Notque

May 2016
I am back editing articles. If you have any issue with my edits, please assume good faith, and feel free to discuss. Happy to consider arguments and challenges to my edits. q (talk) 01:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Criticism of Noam Chomsky article
This isn't the first time that this has happened. You might be interested in seeing this. I'll ask User:Cadr to review the issue as he is a linguist familiar with Chomsky's scholarly work. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 08:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

you rock —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.94.105.238 (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Adam Smith
I'm very pleased to be your first personal example of WP:AGF in action :). It was completely obvious that your edits were not vandalism, due in large part to the thoughtful edit summaries you used (and it certainly didn't hurt that you added a whole section of sourced content). Too often people attack those editors they disagree with instead of working together, or even trying to work together. In case you can't tell I'm a big fan of the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. And I'm very glad that you are a helpful and reasonable person to deal with; I've had more than a few editors that have tested the limits of my assumption of good faith. Keep up the good work :). -FrankTobia (talk) 00:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey!
Howzit going? Just a quick note to let you know that I am reviewing the situation.BernardL (talk) 05:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Response
Just saw your message on my talk page and I just have to say that I am not all that familiar with the historical background of libertarianism so I might not be much of a help in that regard. However if edit warring on that article gets out of hand just tell me and I'll try and take care of it but try and settle any content disputes on the talk page because no one benefits from edit wars. Thanks.--Jersey Devil (talk) 06:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Adam Smith II
Q, I just now noticed that you had posted a wonderfully reasoned response to my post. I hadn't looked over there, and was unaware that I had failed to respond. Anyway, I am unable at this time to devote the time necessary to give a response. Unfortunately, the time that I usually compose such discussive comments is the weekend, and this weekend, I will be without computer access. I really appreciate the time you took to compose your response; I want to mull it over and give your comments as much respect as they deserve by providing a good response on my part. I will do this, but it could easily be ten days before I can. Until then, all the best. Unschool (talk) 00:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Libertarian Principles needs work
As I wrote on libertarianism talk, especially in the principles section, feel free to suggest how to integrate anti-property libertarian principles with pro-property ones. Although I have hung out with leftist libertarian/anarchist/syndicalist/communists on and off for 30 years, I would not try to describe their views/principles since really don't have knowledge or energy to defend anything I said against disagreements. It probably needs to be a shorter section with links to various theorists. I was going to clean up the movement stuff first. Carol Moore 03:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Carolmooredc {talk}

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

SAP HANA Edits
Well, my mistake. :( I am kind of new with Wikipedia edits and started to provide information about this topic as it was almost empty and I know some info. Thanks for your comments in helping me to become a better editor. I will make edits to remove some of the text I added that could be interpreted as promotional or biased. I am going to add more edits to other articles too. Thanks.

I will follow other database page structure and text tone.

Reference errors on 1 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * On the PostgreSQL page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=732542990 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F732542990%7CPostgreSQL%5D%5D Ask for help])
 * Responding to a bot, but I fixed the issue. q (talk) 04:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * On the PostgreSQL page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=735791591 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F735791591%7CPostgreSQL%5D%5D Ask for help])

Reference errors on 27 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Adam Smith page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=736381576 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F736381576%7CAdam Smith%5D%5D Ask for help])

A kitten for you!
For clearing up the libertarianism page

Ubister (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC) 

WP:LEAD
I have noted that on several occasions you have removed several paragraphs from lead sections of articles arguing that the lead is too long and that it repeats content in the body. You should read WP:LEAD our policy on lead sections which shows that the lead must be a stand alone summary of the article's entire content - therefore everything in the lead must be repeated in the body of the article. WP:LEADSIZE describes that the length of the lead depends on the length of the article that it summarizes.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 09:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I do think that the lead in articles should not be excessively long. It's not just that it repeats content in the article, but more than it contains content that isn't a lead summary, and is repeated content. I will make more specific edits to cut down the areas instead of removing the two large sections to try to bring the size down. q (talk) 15:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)