User talk:Observer1989

September 2023
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Indo-Aryan peoples. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

I am neither "brain dead" nor "full of propaganda." You will not get very far here if you treat others in this way. — Manticore  00:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)


 * why are you taking that on yourself? i didnt attack you. i just tagged you because you are the one who reverted my edit claiming its just a rant mentioning the same. everything else was tageted towards a specific group of people who are invloved in such activities.are you one of them? why are you offended? my statments were in general not for you.i dont even know you. Observer1989 (talk) 03:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 00:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

You already have an open unblock request. No need for a second. Which one open unblock request do you want reviewed? --Yamla (talk) 12:56, 12 October 2023 (UTC)


 * hi yamla, both requests are almost the same.in second one i just changed editor tagging me to an admin tagging and targetting me for my opinions on talk page.they blocked me without even any warning.cherrypicked my sentences without the whole context. i am here to improve encyclopedia not to put baseless allegations on any community.all my edits are to improve wikipedia.you can check.but i am blocked for my opinions on talk page.i agree i became emotional and said some things which might hurt some people(not unsubstantiated tho) but its not fair to block me INDEFINITELY for my opinion, its extremely targetted Observer1989 (talk) 13:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It's abusive to have two simultaneous unblock requests. Which one do you want someone else to review? --Yamla (talk) 13:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * second one as i got a notification for first one that "yama left a message at you talk page 1m ago" so i thot action was taken on first.i am new to wikipedia and might not be familiar with the actions considered as "abuse" Observer1989 (talk) 13:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've closed the first one. --Yamla (talk) 13:08, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. 331dot (talk) 16:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)