User talk:Operator873/Archive 7

Vandalism
I like to learn how to revert vandalism. I currently use Twinkle to do the job. I would like to learn new techniques when I revert vandalism. Can I become a student of yours? Mstrojny (talk) 13:40, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hey there. I'm still around, even if I haven't edited. I'd be happy to take you oon as a CVN student. Are you still interested?  Operator873 talk connect  14:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. I am interested. Mstrojny (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Lets talk! Join me in anytime you are available. If you type Operator873, it'll ping me and I'll respond quickly.  Operator873  talk connect  20:34, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * How long does this course take? Mstrojny (talk) 02:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It depends on the student. You're advancing quickly, however. Probably a week or so left (just time enough to be ready for PERMs and me to feel comfortable putting my name on your training.)  Operator873 talk connect  02:27, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Counter-Vandalism Academy
Hey! I saw you were an available counter vandalism trainer. I was wondering if you be interested in training me. Thanks! CalOtter (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey there! Sorry so long on getting back with you. University is kicking my butt this semester. I'd be happy to help! You may have to understand my other obligations to school though. Via IRC, you'd have a direct line of access to me 24 hours a day (save for when I actually do sleep). haha! Just let me know if you're still interested.  Operator873 talk connect  05:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Sure! CalOtter (talk) 14:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey there! Noticed you stopped by IRC while I was asleep. I'm awake and available now. My apologies for my weird sleep schedule.  Operator873 talk connect  18:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * More tasks provided. Great job on Block 1!!  Operator873 talk connect  16:27, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

User page
Mind if I take some inspiration from your awesome userpage? A 10 fireplane Imform me 20:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Not at all. Go for it! I'll check back and see what your results were. I'm excited to see what you do with it.  Operator873 talk connect  20:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Awesome thank you, I'll make sure and put a little something to show where it came from (you)  A 10 fireplane Imform me  20:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Finishing up training
I feel very confident in my ability to fight vandalism and among other things on this encyclopedia thanks to you and other Wikipedians. I was wondering if I can take the final exam soon. Any thoughts? Mstrojny (talk) 19:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I do believe you may be ready. I'll get the final exam to you later today.  Operator873 talk connect  15:58, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have finished the final exam. Mstrojny (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Joining as trainee
Hi greetings, I would like to join as a trainee under you as a part of CVU. I'm well interested in countering vandalism. Now I am using Twinkle. I like to learn more about countering vandalism. Please accept, if you like. Regards.-- PATH SLOPU (Talk) 10:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Hey Operator873
I am having trouble with freenode and can’t log in. Can we talk on here?Thekidn1 (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , Sure! My apologies, I've been on a brief wikibreak in order to get married. I'll be reviewing your activity and posting your first CVU assignments soon.  Operator873 talk connect  04:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

I haven't been on recently. Im in school and have had a lot of homework. Sorry, but my time on is majorly reduced. Hope this is ok or we can post-pone training. Sorry, Thekidn1 (talk) 12:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , That's fine! I understand completely  Operator873 talk connect  17:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Hey User:Operator873, I'm on now if you want! I have some free time till about 15 min from now if you want. Let me know, Thekidn1 (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

ACC request
Can you please create User:Arbitration Bot for me? Email/IRC for details. Bradv 🍁  04:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , done per the discussion we had on IRC for privacy reasons.  Operator873 talk connect  04:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Regarding Counter-Vandalism
I request from you for Counter-Vandalism course training from you. Please if possible accept my request.Manupriy Ahluwalia (talk) 02:18, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Thinking about you...
Hey Operator873! It's been quite some time since we've said hi to one another... I just wanted to leave you a message and wish you a great day and happy editing, and let you know that I was thinking about you... I hope you're doing well, and I hope you remain active in this project and that we keep in touch. :-) Best -  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   06:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Cvua
Can tutor me for anti vandalism work? Goblin Islander (talk) 20:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately Operator873 has been fairly busy IRL so I'm afraid you may have to ask another trainer. Hiàn (talk) 03:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Account creator granted
After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things: If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
 * The account creator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the account creator right will result in its removal by an administrator.

Hey Operator!
Hey Operator! Just wanted to make sure you are safe during the COVID-19 period! Please let me know!

Thekidn1 (talk) 11:18, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm doing very well. Thanks for checking in.  Operator873 talk connect  13:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Glad to hear! Thekidn1 (talk) 16:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

NEW EDITOR QUESTIONS
Hello, I need to address a situation that has been flagged as vandalism on a page. Fans constantly change content. However, the content with sources are inaccurate as well. It’s about a wedding that never occurred for one of three individuals. The sources relayed and relied on false and grossly inaccurate content for tabloids. The sources state a wedding occurred and the position legally is one of fallacy. It must be true since we have no other information... is how they see it.

The real couple has kept a private life out of media attention for a variety of reasons, including relationships with INTEL. How can we go about removing any wedding news which has no merit other than a comma missing leading to conclusions amongst community?

You will find, all sourced material relies only on another article. No media outlet has proof or could ever validate the claims other than heresay. Looking to invalidate referenced sources.

Any information would greatly help us.

Very Respectfully,

2020Editor. 2020Editor (talk) 06:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Greetings! Which article are you referring to? And may I ask what your relationship with the subjects in question is?  Operator873 talk connect  17:54, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

On May 15, 2019, Sheikh Hamdan married his cousin Sheikha Shaikha bint Saeed bin Thani Al Maktoum.[15][16][17][18][19].

These are being used as sources which are relying off of each other’s misinformation. One states the Dubai Government Media “verified the date” and “Dubai Government Media confirmed the news” this is extremely vague information upon which several news sources relied on to spread the story. You’ll note, the ONLY verified marriage that occurred was that of Maktoum and Midya which was announced the later part of the previous year. The other persons named as being married are grossly incorrect and it’s warranted to not allow the sources nor the information. You’ll note several attempts to completely remove the information by some of the parties involved, yet fans obsessed, insist on continuous editing.

We would like to stop the disinformation and the media is attempting to gain knowledge of the information of the real facts and names by doing this.

Typical strategy for media attempting to access name of the significant other which has been strategically kept confidential for over 4 years.

Even if the source content is removed we expect immediate vandalism repeatedly. How can we protect ourselves, as public servants when misinterpreted information spreads rapidly?

I am directly involved with the information and directly affected. 2020Editor (talk) 08:39, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

You’ll also note in any and ALL articles there are no references in the same sentence using the full title and full name of Hamdan with the declaration of marriage to the full name of person listed. The same for Ahmed. The sources jump topics in presenting the information because they have no information that can be verified aside from a wedding. We would like to challenge any article referenced as a source on this topic for a spouse and or a wedding. It is our request to have any and all referenced material with regards to any sort of spouse be invalidated and removed unable to vandalize. This would also be an inquiry for protecting any identity or disclosure of future named spouse until a formal document is released to the press by the ACTUAL persons involved.

Thank you for your understanding to this very unfortunate situation created by the media.

V/r

X

2020Editor (talk) 10:00, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Since you are directly involved in the issue, you shouldn't edit the article yourself. Instead you can request other editors review the information on the article's talk page. That being said, it does look like the information written on the article is supported with references and reliable sources, so it would be challenging to remove. If you have a deeper concern, or proof something is not accurate, I'd encourage you to use the contact options and discuss the information you have. I cannot assist you in this matter.  Operator873 talk connect  20:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Of course I would not edit the information. Perhaps it may be easier to get them all in one swoop and sue them all in a court of law. Maybe that’s the best route, seems a bit tedious and I’m sure admitting publishing of inaccuracies is not something they’ll jump to acknowledge fault by deleting or correcting.

Thank you for your time and information. This will soon be corrected.

V/r X 2020Editor (talk) 04:32, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Please be aware, on any Wikipedia project making legal threats is strictly prohibited.  Operator873 talk connect  14:21, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

They are not threats, it is a legal strategy for handling the situation. If anyone goes to the originsl source of claim they will see this: “UAE to celebrate today the official wedding ceremony of Dubai Crown Prince, and his two brothers, Sheikh Maktoum, Deputy Ruler of Dubai and Sheikh Ahmed, chairman of the Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Knowledge Foundation”

Source: Government of Dubai Media

Keeping in mind: No brides were listed ever. Also keeping in mind a CELEBRATION OF THE ELDERS occurred which was a celebration for historical marriage of the Al Maktoum families. As stated, there have NEVER been ANY female brides listed from ANY official source. The addition of female names were mere speculation and grossly incorrect. Laws provide protections from such poor reporting and damage to reputation, images, anguish caused to all involved parties. Suggesting legal recourse is not threatening,it’s a legal remedy for intentional wrongdoing for those who have intentionally misguided the public at the peril of others. Why would mention of legal action or recourse be strictly prohibited on Wikipedia?

2020Editor (talk) 20:57, 27 July 2020 (UTC)


 * original 2020Editor (talk) 21:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Wives, ex-wives, family members, palace employees, members of HH's court and and anyone else--- please do not try to edit based on personal knowledge, personal relationships, inside knowledge, public records, or not so public records, etc. This is an encyclopedia, all content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:51, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 2020Editor (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Posted from talk page. There are a few editors that are editing for personal reasons. Again, I ask all sources be examined for authentic and official content without the articles hearsay or additions. To be a valid source there is nothing more to report than the only original source not listing any female names in reference to any brides. Simply a wedding of the elders. 2020Editor (talk) 22:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)