User talk:OrinZ

Proposed deletion of Maral Ibragimova
The article Maral Ibragimova has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:38, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror
Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?- 🐦Do☭torWho42 ( ⭐ ) 11:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Prometheus Fuels


The article Prometheus Fuels has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not appear to meet the notability requirements"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 14:08, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Bald and Bankrupt
Saw your post on the delete page. I put it up for AfD nomination. I've watched the page for some time and the question of "does the article have enough sources to be on Wikipedia" has come up a few times. For some time there's been a push to add unsourced information to the page, but that really jumped recently due to a organized campaign on reddit. Another user in the talk page identified the push was coming from reddit. After watching the page for some I was just curious if it should exist. As you can tell from the discussion it's not exactly clear if it should exist. Thanks for your insight! --Nemov (talk) 12:34, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, I somehow missed this! The connection based on these two bits of info was indeed tenuous. Thank you for that clarification, I'll update my comment to reflect my changed opinion. –OrinZ (talk) 13:07, 21 April 2021 (UTC)