User talk:Outlanderssc

In regard to your assertion that the page isaac binkovitz meets criteria for speedy deletion, i would like to point out that this article is twice as long as the one that was previously posted, contains corrections of major factual errors, and is overall a completely different article. it seems unfair that you have marked it for speedy deletion so, well, speedily, that there is not yet even a talk page for it, therefore no way to post objections to its consideration for speedy deletion.


 * There was more wordage, but not more content. He is still as unnoteworthy as he was when the page was originally deleted. It was also clear that the author spelled the name differently to avoid the bots picking up the new article, something that clearly implies some sort of premeditation.


 * And also, please sign your notes so I can reply on your talk page''.

His name was spelled differently because it was misspelled before. I accept the judgement that he's not noteworthy enough and fair, but please don't imply that he or I intentionally abused posting power, because the reposting was 1. an honest attempt to rectify some factual errors and include more relevant content, and 2. not in any way associated with the first article inasmuch as the original poster and I had no communication on the subject prior to the reposting. The article was re-written from scratch with different content by a different person than the first with no premeditation.


 * Too bad you did so much work for a non-notable bio -

Thanks for adding the template to the Brother-in-law page. You might want to make a user page, too.-- Anti-Anonymex2 Come to my page! I've gone caliente loco! 20:43, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Using lowercase
I would like to notice that before you created the French Curve article, we already had the French curve article. So, I would suggest that in the future you do not use capitals in article titles except for the first letter and other cases requred by grammar (like names, which are obviously capital). Thank you for your addition. Oleg Alexandrov 22:28, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

If you look, you will find that I did not write the article French Curve, I merely removed the reference to its use in Computer drafting, which was innacurate. If you feel it needs additional editing, feel free to do so. --Outlander 11:54, 12 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Hey you are right! Both you and the contributor before you were redlinks, so I thought it was the same person. :) Sorry. Oleg Alexandrov 12:03, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

milky seas article
Thanks for the entry regarding our milky seas study.

I wanted to make a clarification, but didn't feel right editing the page about my own work.

It's not really correct that "no in-field observation of the phenomenon has been made, so the assertion of bioluminescence is conjectural". One of the coolest aspects of the study, and what really nailed it down, was that a ship was transiting through the region and reported entering and leaving the glowing seas at the exact locations that the boundaries appeared on the satellite. You can see some more info on this page, including a link to the full PDF of the article with a plot of the ship track...

Regards, Steve Haddock and Steve Miller

Wikiproject subproject notification (late, sorry)
Hi Outlanderssc. I'm contacting you because you are a member of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality. This project is inactive but exists. Anyway, I recently created a project WikiProject Pedophilia which by right ought to be subproject ot Sexology and sexuality. In fact, I was (properly) upbraided for creating this project without consulting the members of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality. (Sorry, I just plain forgot). Anyway, my questions and comments are:
 * Are you still an active member of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality?
 * Hi! As a member of the (logical) parent project, you are invited to view, contribute to, oversee, and/or join the subproject Wikiproject Pedophilia.
 * Be aware that we have had a difficult birth and are considered by some to be inherently controversial, and may have some future controversies due to the sensitive nature of the material in our purview, although I hope not.
 * In the normal course of things, I would join WikiProject Sexology and sexuality and edit it to include Wikiproject Pedophilia as a subproject. Do you have any objections or comments on that.
 * We are considering renaming WikiProject Pedophilia to Wikiproject Paraphilia, for various reasons. As a member of the parent project, do you have any thoughts on that?Herostratus 22:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Grayson Space Navy
Hi. Some time ago, you proposed the page for Grayson Space Navy for speedy deletion, giving the reason as 'nonsense'. I know this is a long time in asking (...a year? Eeech), but may I ask why? Bengaley 12:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:72Corvorado.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:72Corvorado.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Barbara_Nitke_web.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Barbara_Nitke_web.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 08:39, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

CHUDWAH
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article CHUDWAH, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of CHUDWAH. Accurizer (talk) 22:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bathroom Kiss.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bathroom Kiss.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Aramoana massacre
I just saw your comment claiming the Aramoana massacre was not significant enough to be included on Wikipedia. How arrogant and completely ignorant can you possibly be? Your comment was highly offensive and shows that you know little of what you were talking about. It was the worse mass murder in New Zealand history; thirteen people were killed, the NZSAS were put on standby and a George Medal and a George Cross were awarded, yet you don't think it warrants a Wikipedia page. You should go back on that page an apologise for you utter rudeness, ignorance and arrogance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.167.22 (talk) 09:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

MMMMV
About the M10 here, is the official listing "tank, destroyer" or "tank destroyer"? I don't want to "correct" it not knowing, so would you if it's wrong? Thanx. Also, FYI, have you seen this? If you've got good sources, do add yourself. Ciao. TREKphiler  hit me ♠  13:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Red Headband


The article Red Headband has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unreferenced orphan, dubious content

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. older ≠ wiser 14:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abrasion (BDSM)


The article Abrasion (BDSM) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources, can't be verified. No indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stillwaterising (talk) 12:08, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, A Defense of Masochism


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, A Defense of Masochism. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - A Defence of Masochism. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at A Defence of Masochism - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.

The book title is in British English, correctly spelt with "defence". Phil Bridger (talk) 21:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:SCARLETSPV.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SCARLETSPV.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:44, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Dungeon Monitor page
I made some edits to this page today. Most were minor, but I removed one sentence my own experience as a DM tells me was quite erroneous. If you have concerns, I'd be happy to discuss them.

I noticed that this page is noted as needing citations. Surely the TES website has suitable articles for citations? If not, let me know and I'll try to dig up some other citation sources.

I'd also be interested in discussing some page deletions I've noticed with you. It seems to me that there are articles being removed that should be on Wikipedia.

CDNRopemaster (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Limits (BDSM)


The article Limits (BDSM) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Another non-notable supposed BDSM term: the books cited as references are not reliable sources. Part of a walled garden.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 02:25, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Griggstown cow for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Griggstown cow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Griggstown cow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Milky sea (detail).jpg


The file File:Milky sea (detail).jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

"Peodeiktophilia" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peodeiktophilia&redirect=no Peodeiktophilia] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion
A redirect or redirects you have created has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. -- MikutoH talk! 00:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)