User talk:Panda2024

January 2024
Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Recognition of same-sex unions in India—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 07:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hi Panda2024! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Recognition of same-sex unions in Israel several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I noticed that you recently removed content from Same-sex marriage in North Carolina without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wiiformii (talk) 21:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Unnecessary based on what?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Israel&oldid=prev&diff=1228279412

how did you determine whether the anchor was unnecessary?

MWQs (talk) 13:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Sagi Golan is hardly a notable person. Panda2024 (talk) 19:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


 * There no notability criteria on an anchor? Almost the opposite, if he was a notable person he'd have his own page and not need an anchor on the short paragraph referring to him. MWQs (talk) 19:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Please don't remove anchors without consulting the editor who added them, they are needed to direct incoming links to the right part of the page. MWQs (talk) 21:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You've got three other editors above giving you feedback on changes they didn't think were constructive. If you repeatedly make changes that break things you risk getting blocked from editing. MWQs (talk) 21:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Panda2024 why do you want it removed!? MWQs (talk) 19:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see what's confusing now, you can remove the link from his name, the square brackets, I'm not sure why that's there. But please put back the anchor template. It links from OTHER pages. MWQs (talk) 20:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)