User talk:Paperxcrip

Notability of LazyMuFFin
A tag has been placed on LazyMuFFin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. \ / (talk) 12:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Judgemental edit summaries
Thank you for your edits, they are appreciated, however, calling other users fags and their edits tripe is less appreciated, please conduct yourself in a civil manner, thank you SpitfireTally-ho! 15:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I try. ^_^ Paperxcrip (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you SpitfireTally-ho! 18:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The Beatles
I strongly advise you to review previous discussions before taking unilateral action on this article; blood has been shed, at least metaphorically, and this debate is approaching WP:LAME. The arguments have been rehearsed time after time, and the current version is now acceptable to the majority. If you really think you can wear down goodwill by going through this loop yet again, good luck to you, but it's not going to make you any friends. Rodhull andemu  01:43, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's already listed in WP:LAME under Punctuation. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:52, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know. That's actually how I got to the Beatles article in the first place. I'm a dastardly creature Paperxcrip (talk) 03:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ''Read. The. Talk. Pages. Consensus is against you. Please stop your disruptive editing and discuss on the Talk page *before* making changes. That's the way we work here. '' Rodhull  andemu  01:49, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm a rebel. I BREAK THE RULES Paperxcrip (talk) 01:51, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * People who break the rules get blocked. End of, but it's your decision whether you want to be allowed to continue editing here. Rodhull  andemu  01:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you haven't noticed, but I'm a newfag. We tend to be of the non-caring persuasion. :3 Paperxcrip (talk) 01:59, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Then arguably, you are expendable as far as collaborating with your fellow-editors to build an encyclopedias is concerned. Egos and attitudes are best left at the door, because those who import them here tend not to last very long, however good their contributions may have been once. Rodhull  andemu  02:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hm. Regarding expendability, how far do you think we can exp e and this series of colons? Paperxcrip (talk) 02:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)