User talk:Pastychomper

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Pastychomper. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! — Asterisk *  Splat → 15:32, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement
Hello. I noticed you've made edits to articles related to the Latter Day Saint movement and thought you might be interested in participating in the WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement. This project aims to serve as a hub for collaboration on elements of the Latter Day Saint movement, Mormonism, Latter Day Saint history, doctrine, practices, and other cultural effects inspired by Joseph Smith, Jr.. You don't have to be a member of the Latter Day Saint movement to participate. Best wishes! — Asterisk *  Splat → 15:34, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 24 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Ebenezer Scrooge page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=639461471 your edit] caused a duplicate page number error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F639461471%7CEbenezer Scrooge%5D%5D Ask for help])

Person from Porlock
Thanks for fixing my edit on Person from Porlock—my finger must have slipped. :) Trivialist (talk) 21:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem - it's easily done! Pastychomper (talk) 07:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Can you PLEASE help me?
Hello Patsychomper,

1. I have proven that Biblical Adam is "The Chosen One" 2. I did so showing this: The Translation is by Dr. Lloyd Ridgeon in his book called Jawanmardi, A Suficode of Honor. At the end of Page 111 starting at page 112 and you will begin reading this that Adam is the Chosen One READ THIS LINK AND WHAT HE TRANSLATED WITH THE HELP OF MANY SCHOLARS AS THIS FROM JAWANMARDI The Book: https://books.google.com/books?id=UiqrBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA111&lpg=PA111&dq=confirming+the+proof+of+the+futuwwat&source=bl&ots=CkXPwmtpVc&sig=ACfU3U2GftjW8lR4J4VkZ8q7j8XrYxOn-g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjVur3DopLhAhUYITQIHSZWDJoQ6AEwAHoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=confirming%20the%20proof%20of%20the%20futuwwat&f=false

Source of link: Title	Jawanmardi: A Sufi Code of Honour: A Sufi Code of Honour Author	Lloyd Ridgeon Publisher Edinburgh University Press, 2011 ISBN 0748645993, 9780748645992 Length	224 pages Subjects Religion › Islam › Sufi

3. It was then removed by an editor on this topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chosen_One

4. He has now locked me out because I continue to find other articles proving Adam the chosen one and yet he continued to remove them such as this proof found on page 12: https://www.academia.edu/7170404/Shaggy_or_Shaved

5. I'm frustrated by this BECAUSE I HAVE PROVEN that Adam is Chosen one over and over and the editor removes all of them. What is so ironic is that NOT ONE other "chosen one" in entire article have ANY SOURCES to prove their title!!!! NO SOURCES!!!!

So, can you please help me with this? Adam is the chosen one from GOD and should be given credit. Thank you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.181.168.42 (talk) 18:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I haven't got involved, or replied before, because going by what was written here, I think this request was meant for someone else. I haven't contributed to the page in question and don't want to get involved in the argument, but a quick look tells me that today there is a link to Adam on the page. Pastychomper (talk) 09:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dyna Star


The article Dyna Star has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EpicPupper (talk) 03:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I was slightly surprised to see that the sources for the page weren't considered reliable, but the dearth of other sources talking about the game might say something about its notability. Pastychomper (talk) 11:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)