User talk:Paul63243

January 2015
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Prime Minister of Canada, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Under Siege, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk page
Can we get you to come back to the Canadian tlak page before editwaring again pls.

Editors who engage in edit warring are liable to be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption. While any edit warring may lead to sanctions, there is a bright-line rule called the three-revert rule (3RR), the violation of which often leads to a block.

The three-revert rule states:


 * -- Moxy (talk) 01:20, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If Moxy hadn't warned you, I would have. WP:WBD. Heavy on the discuss now please. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Look, man, as far as I am concerned you can stick your head as far up your ass as you want. Due to your intransigence, I withdraw my contributions, and the benefit of my superior expertise as to the subject-matter. You can go and wallow in your ignorance, but it is wrong for you to seek to enforce your ignorance on others. Paul63243 (talk) 16:36, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PierrePoilievrePCMP.tiff
 Thanks for uploading File:PierrePoilievrePCMP.tiff. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Comments on my user page
One, please post comments on users' talk pages only; user pages are not for comments by others. Two, I have absolutely no clue what your issue with the Bomarc page is. If I left out some information in converting to the correct infobox, it was either inadvertent or doesn't belong in that infobox. - BilCat (talk) 19:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=3dz0m2ubQw1KSnb_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_6neAwvlg4IBFkMt&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)