User talk:PeaceThruPramana26

MOS:JOBTITLES
Please stop edit warring against MOS:JOBTITLES at Foreign Secretary. JOBTITLES requires that titles like the one in the lede sentence be lowercase. Please read that guideline as it will explain your confusion. If you continue to revert this application of a clearly established guideline, I will refer you to WP:ANI. Wallnot (talk) 22:39, 21 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't think you even read the MOS or you'd know that 'Foreign Secretary' denotes a title and thus is meant to be capitalised. I can see by your own talk page and userpage history, this is something that multiple users such as GibbsNotGibbs have attempted to correct you on, but you seem to react hostility. Perhaps it is best then that you bring in an intervening moderator, because at this point, any attempts to revert the capitalisation should be seen as vandalism and will be interpreted as such by me. PeaceThruPramana26 (talk) 23:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you've looked through my edit history, you'll note that there is a strong consensus behind my interpretation of JOBTITLES, and users like GibbsNotGibbs were all ultimately corrected. If you disagree, please start a discussion at the article talk page. See WP:BRD. You cannot simply continue to edit war in favor of your interpretation of the guideline without discussing it with other users at the relevant place. Doing so would be considered disruptive editing. Thanks, Wallnot (talk) 23:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to RT (TV network). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please do not cite an academic source that is completely irrelevant to the content that it is cited for, as you did with No Illusions'' in Special:Diff/1073677725. It gives readers and other editors, especially ones that do not have access to the source, the false impression that the content is better-supported than it actually is. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk  '' 07:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I just realized that you referenced a different edition of the book than the one I have access to. I apologize for the incorrect warning, and invite you to provide a quotation (and page number) from your edition of the book to substantiate your claim at . —  Newslinger  talk   10:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

I don't accept your apology. You're an administrator and should know better before jumping to such hasty, pre-drawn conclusions (which incidentally, seem to work in one direction). This sort of harassment is ridiculous, and for what? An edit? PeaceThruPramana26 (talk) 19:49, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on BBC World Service. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —  Newslinger   talk   18:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Please refer to the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for a recommended way to propose controversial edits to a Wikipedia article. —  Newslinger  talk   18:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

You keep this targeted harassment up, and I swear I'm bringing you to the complaint board. PeaceThruPramana26 (talk) 18:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited El Salvador, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cacao. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Not sure about PeaceThruPramana26. Thank you. Graham 87 10:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Blocked per ANI
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham 87 09:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Block appeal
How do you figure? It doesn't seem like my appeal was taking very seriously, seeing as there wasn't even the least slight attempt at considering my point of view. PeaceThruPramana26 (talk) 00:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

PeaceThruPramana26 (talk) 00:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

I believe I contributed quite a fair bit to Wikipedia. to merely dismiss me as a troll when I've spent literally hours here to trying to make this a better place is not only insulting, it's absolutely, prima facie wrong. PeaceThruPramana26 (talk) 00:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

To reiterate: Am I really being banned from wikipedia with an account that is almost a year old because I made an admin mad during an edit war dispute? That is honestly what it seems like from my perspective. PeaceThruPramana26 (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * No, of course you aren't. JBW (talk) 00:31, 11 December 2022 (UTC)