User talk:Phamer

Speedy deletion of Learn more breathe better
A tag has been placed on Learn more breathe better, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 16:25, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Learn More Breathe Better
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Learn More Breathe Better, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.copd-international.com/COPDInfo/Comments.asp?Entry=83. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Grace Anne Dorney Koppel
You really need to work on your contributions! You need to read Manual of Style! You way over linked the article, only one link per section please! Didn't format your references properly. TV program names and periodicals names are italicized. No with the bolding either! Watch your external links, nothing after html or htm please. It looks like you just copied+pasted from the nhlbi.nih.gov website, usually a no-no here. And how can every reference be:

Use the title of the article or page that you are referencing.
 * Media featuring Grace Anne Koppel
 * Grace Koppel in The New York Times
 * Grace Koppel on CBS
 * Grace Koppel in Woman's Day
 * Grace Koppel in Newsweek
 * Grace Koppel on Diane Rehm

RIGHT WAY:


 * COPD Learn More Breathe Better in the News. - National Heart Lung and Blood Institute.
 * Grady, Denise. - Health: "From Smoking Boom, a Major Killer of Women". - New York Times. - November 29, 2007
 * Grace Koppel. - CBS News. - September 12, 2007
 * WD Health: "Breathing Lessons". - Woman's Day
 * Spring Health: "Coping with COPD: A Conversation with Grace Anne Dorney Koppel". - Newsweek. - (c/o Washington Post)
 * Guest host: Susan Page: "Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease". - The Diane Rehm Show. - WAMU 88.5 American University Radio. - March 1, 2007

Oh, and don't parrot the full name over and over, Grace Anne Dorney Koppel, Grace Anne Dorney Koppel, Grace Anne Dorney Koppel, Grace Anne Dorney Koppel, Grace Anne Dorney Koppel, Grace Anne Dorney Koppel, Grace Anne Dorney Koppel, Grace Anne Dorney Koppel.....oeyvie!

You get an "D-" on this one. Sloppy work. Hit the books. 4.240.78.203 (talk) 08:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

File:Ted and Grace Anne Koppel.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Ted and Grace Anne Koppel.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:16, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Learn More Breathe Better


The article Learn More Breathe Better has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable, no sourcing found, promotional"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:57, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:COPD LMBB logo.jpg


The file File:COPD LMBB logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 09:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)