User talk:Piano no who

hi

Bandstand-Gazebo Merge
Hello, Piano no who. I rolled back your merge today of these two articles. While there are similarities between bandstands and gazebos, their uses are different enough to merit separate articles. Both have links to the other, so those interested in that one specific use for a gazebo-type structure will still be able to find bandstand, and viseyversey, but I don't think it can be said that a gazebo is a type or subset of a bandstand. Perhaps it can be said that a bandstand is a type of gazebo, though I'm not in favor of a merge in that direction either. Both pages should remain separate and both developed further. I'll note this on the talk page at Talk:Gazebo for further discussion, if you wish, and I'll give the gazebo article some attention myself. d u f f  06:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Skiing in india


A tag has been placed on Skiing in india, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Pichakari listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pichakari. Since you had some involvement with the Pichakari redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Central-logo4.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Central-logo4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 4 August 2023 (UTC)