User talk:PlayCuz

Thanks for your work on Goodwill Zwelithini kaBhekuzulu‎, and your work on cites. I posted a note at Talk:Goodwill_Zwelithini_kaBhekuzulu asking about HRH Prince Dennis Njeru Mucheke - who (I believe) is the son of Mswati III of Swaziland or maybe he doesn't exist .. Any chance you could look into it ? Google just shows wikipedia'ish references - we need something else. Wizzy&hellip; &#9742; 07:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Race and crime in the United States
Hi PlayCuz. I appreciate your concern over the article. But copying and pasting an enormous block of text is not exactly the best way to go about resolving a NPOV dispute. I request that you return to the page and break that block down into what you feel are individual violations so that we can address them appropriately. However, and this is irrespective of your concerns, that talk page is becoming quite long, and archiving will become necessary very soon out of technical reasons. When do you suppose we archive it? And please note: archiving is a completely normal process, and does not "delete" or "suppress" anything. It just helps keep the page size down so folks with slower connections have less problems loading the page. We're already receiving the warning that "This page is 202 kilobytes long", which is a good indication that it's time to archive. Anyways, please do come back to the page and make individual critiques so that we can work on them. Thanks, -- Aryaman (talk) 20:57, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi again. I would like to renew my request that you please participate in the discussion at Race and crime in the United States. I have made what I feel to be a detailed response to your long list of concerns, and without some kind of response from you, I consider the issue resolved. I'm willing to give you ample time, but I'm not going to let the template remain indefinitely. The idea behind templates is to identify problematic areas of an article so that they can be improved. It is not to permanently label an article as "problematic" and leave it at that. I can appreciate that you want to "protest" the article as a whole, but Wikipedia is not really the place for that kind of behavior. If you feel that your concerns have not been addressed, then please participate in the discussion so that we can make appropriate changes if and where necessary. Thanks, -- Aryaman (talk) 14:21, 19 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi again. I'd just like to bump my request that you participate in the discussion. I've responded to your list of concerns, and without a rejoinder, the discussion dies. I'd like for your involvement to extend further than impeding the archiving of the talk page. Thanks, -- Aryaman (talk) 10:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


 * This is the last time I will request your participation. I feel your concerns have been adequately addressed, and you have given nothing in the way of a response to the contrary. I will soon remove the tag and begin archiving the talk page. I will probably go with a bot, so inactive discussions will be archived first. I would like to request that you discontinue the practice of tagging and then disappearing. If you still feel that something in the article needs to be changed, then please indicate this on the talkpage so that editors can work on improving it where necessary. Though not required to do so, I would also request that you only voice your concerns if you are willing to help improve the article. Thanks, -- Aryaman (talk) 22:36, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Your recent comments on East Hollywood
Hi PlayCuz, I noticed you made the following recent comments:

the fact that same info is presented immediately below obviates need for repetition -- unless high-end real-estate salesmen are Wikipedia's target audience."

I agree. I have included your objection to a proposal that is will be circled for public comment. Please see it and participate so that perhaps more will agree with you and there will be a guideline established for neighborhood leads to incorporate this view.

It is found here: User_talk:GeorgeLouis and at User:GeorgeLouis/Sandbox. GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Please also see my objections to only highlighting whites as important in neighborhood leads.

Thanks. --Daniel E Romero (talk) 22:13, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/PlayCuz. Thank you. ''Hi! Sorry about this. I thought it best to clear up the accusation made at Talk:House of Dlamini one way or the other.'' Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked this account for one week for sockpuppetry per the findings of Sockpuppet investigations/PlayCuz. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:26, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Please re-activate my User:FactStraight account and its history, as promised since that has always been my primary and heavily used account. Thank you. PlayCuz (talk) 05:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * As per your request, this account has been blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  04:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)