User talk:Pureofsoul

License tagging for Image:Kylacover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kylacover.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Reginevelasquez.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Reginevelasquez.png. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 20:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Kylapromo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kylapromo.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 20:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Reginevelasquez.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Reginevelasquez.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:970501842 l.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:970501842 l.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Standard practice in edits
Hi. If you want to make a link to another page on en.wikipedia.org, just put the words between double square-brackets. Like this whatever.

Also, please don't delete entries on Talk pages. They are not part of the encylopedia, they are just for discussion. Gronky 00:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I noticed that you edited someone else's comment at Talk:Kyla for clarity, spelling or grammar. As a rule, refrain from editing others' comments without their permission. Though it may appear helpful to correct typing errors, grammar, etc., please do not go out of your way to bring talk pages to publishing standards, since it is not terribly productive and will tend to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks,  --  moe .RON   talk  01:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Standard practice in commenting part 2 (Re: Halo-halo)
Please sign your comments by ending them with four tilde marks (~), this automatically signs your comments so you don't have to type out a signature over and over again, and it's proper wiki etiquette to do so. Just trying to make your wiki experience a little smoother here; unsigned comments are seen by many editors as being poor form.

Regarding halo-halo ... as I stated before, that claim has been made by various and sundry websites with absolutely no substantiation whatsoever, so I feel it is best to leave it out of Wikipedia until there is a proper citation (and honestly I think that "origin theory" is apocryphal at best). That's why we have Talk Pages: to hash these things out before displaying it as public information.

Hope this has been helpful for you, and cheers! -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 07:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)