User talk:Qirtaiba

Update on appeal
I have been wrongly blocked from editing Wikipedia. This page will document the current status of my request for unblocking.


 * 1) I first requested unblocking via this talk page (see below), but | in violation of Wikipedia policy, the request was | dealt with in collusion with the administrator who had blocked me. When I tried again requesting an independent administrator's review, my request was declined without explanation less than two hours later, suggesting that collusion was still ongoing (most unblock requests take days or weeks to receive attention).
 * 2) Unhappy with this, I next turned to the Arbitration Committee; not only due to the apparent collusion, but because the insinuations that were made about me in justification of my block made it unsuitable for public discussion in any case (which is one of the grounds that enlivens ArbCom's jurisdiction). However, they declined to hear the appeal for unclear reasons, and suggested I appeal via |Wikipedia's UTRS system for block appeals instead.
 * 3) I duly made an appeal through the UTRS system, which initially received a response (visible in the history of this page), "I think user's comments have been misconstrued, but as a laymen in that area, I can understand how he came across the way he did." But this comment was quickly reverted and replaced with the suggestion that I contact Wikipedia Trust & Safety instead, "due to the complexities therein".
 * 4) While the appeal seems pretty simple to me – either I violated the Child protection policy or I didn't – I have gone ahead and reached out to Wikipedia Trust & Safety as requested, and that is where the matter currently sits.

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advocacy in violation of the Child protection policy (it doesn't matter if it's nuanced and incremental when the overarching aim is the same, as with your so-called "child protection" organization). If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. El_C 05:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Consult history for archive
I removed some content from this page intending to put it in an archive, then discovered that I can't even make an archive of my own talk page while I am blocked. So for now, please consult history if you want to see it. I'll restore it to an archive once I am unblocked. Jeremy Malcolm (talk) 16:11, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

is closed. Due to the complexities therein, it would be best for user to email Trust and Safety. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * DFO, I don't understand why WP:UTRS was even involved — TPA was not revoked at the time (though now it is). Oh well. Thanks. El_C 02:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * UTRS can be used for appeals where non-public information might be relevant, regardless of TPA. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked
Whatever public information campaign about this failure of process at Wikipedia will have to happen outside of it. Talk page access revoked. For legal: legal@wikimedia.org. El_C 02:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)


 * already gave 'm ca@undefinedwikimedia.org Now there are choices. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

UTRS abuse
User has continued to deliberately abuse UTRS via requests,, , and. I have requested UTRS access be permanently revoked. --Yamla (talk) 11:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC)