User talk:Quality617

November 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Constable. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 09:51, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edits and comments[edit]

Hi. Your edits are being reverted because you making no attempt to explain them. Please use the talk page as well as the Edit summary to explain why you are removing sections of the article. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:53, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References are now cited.

Thanks! I tidied it up a bit. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:50, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you and User:OneEjack have chosen to edit war at Constable, but it is not acceptable. Use the article talk page. The next revert I see from either of you will lead to the page being locked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:09, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then be prepared to lock, because OneEjack will not stop. I have posted verifiable information, and he will continue to post the same information he is posting, which is pretty much inaccurate. I don't know why he continues to treat the wiki like a school yard fight, and I have no interest in prodding him on nor getting on the bad side of the editorial staff. Quality617 (talk) 01:16, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page updated. Now I need a nap. Quality617 (talk) 02:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]