User talk:Qwertyxp2000/Archives/2016/January

Happy New Year, Qwertyxp2000!


Happy New Year! Qwertyxp2000, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 00:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

Happy New Year, Qwertyxp2000!


Happy New Year! Qwertyxp2000, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 01:11, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Ha ha
Adding a picture of a cake to the article on "you can't have your cake and eat it" is silly. "Ha ha" seems like an appropriate answer to what seems like a silly attempt at humor. --Macrakis (talk) 23:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * But still, you could've put a more appropriate summary. Also, I wasn't intending for humor on that article. Another problem is that I didn't feel you were assuming good faith because you used an edit summary that would be seen in Rollbackers and standard Rollback is reserved for reverting vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 23:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi
If you find time for it, please review my nom article Helena Bergström at TAFI. Much appreciated. --BabbaQ (talk) 18:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Windows 2000
Hi, I noticed on your userpage you'd mentioned you haven't yet had a chance to work with Windows 2000. I just thought I'd mentioned I've been having a lot of fun messing about with Windows 95, 98, 2000, Me and XP in college. We've been using Oracle VM VirtualBox, with great results. It's free, but you do need a valid installation disc or ISO for the operating system you want to use (with a valid license), which might be hard to come by. I've got it installed on my laptop, too, which has relatively low specs (1.2 GHz single core processor, 4 GB RAM). It might be worth looking into. Adam talk - contribs 22:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Template drafts
Hi Qwertyxp2000, I have just removed the AFC submission template from a set of Draft templates you have created. An AFC review is not required for such drafts, if you have consensus to create these uw templates then simply go ahead and do so, it's of no relevance to the Articles for Creation review process. BTW the templates look really useful imho. Thanks Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)