User talk:Radiofoot89

WikiProject Bedfordshire
Hey,
 * You are listed as a member of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a project that I am currently trying to revive. Please have a look at the projects talk page for an explanation. If you would still like to participate, please could you leave a note on my talk page. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 20:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Bedfordshire
Hello, Radiofoot89, this message is being sent to inform you that, due to over three monts editing inactivity on WikiProject Bedfordshire, your username has been moved to an 'inactive participant'. If you object or would like to re-start contributing, please move your name back up to the active members list. Thanks,

Acather96 (talk) 07:44, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Duplicate template now merged so redundant
It appears that supervening edits from the editors of Template:Luton have seized upon your thorough list of wards and included this now in their larger template, now that now has a 100% duplicate of your section (your template), so I have simply proposed deletion as the merger has already taken place. Many thanks. Adam37 (talk) 15:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC).

Nomination for deletion of Template:Places_Within_Luton
Template:Places_Within_Luton has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Nomination of Diverse FM for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diverse FM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Diverse FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Luton
Portal:Luton, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Luton and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Luton during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:50, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Independent schools in Luton


A tag has been placed on Category:Independent schools in Luton indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)