User talk:Rafaelluik

Welcome to Wikipedia
Mushroom (Talk) 02:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Speed Dial (disambiguation)
I have nominated Speed Dial (disambiguation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Speed Dial (disambiguation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Giftiger Wunsch    [TALK]  22:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Opera 10.5 screenshot.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Opera 10.5 screenshot.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Mozilla
Please stop vandalizing the Mozilla article. Stick to Opera articles. It's clear you have an agenda. Thanks. -- Schapel (talk) 23:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Instead of trying to improve articles on Wikipedia, you are trying to promote a product, Opera. When I removed a positive statement about Opera, you have retaliated by removing a factual statement about Netscape from a Mozilla article. Please stop vandalizing the article. If "proof" is what you need just look to JavaScript and the Netscape Plugin API, two technologies developed in the early days of Netscape, along with many other basic features that all browsers now use. Now stop vandalizing articles. Thanks. -- Schapel (talk) 13:27, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * After looking at some other of your edits, I think it's best to bring an admin or mediator in. You have threatened retaliation against other editors in the past (one of your comments says you will remove Firefox from Wikipedia). If you cannot be civil, you should not be editing on Wikipedia at all. If you have a concern, express it civilly in discussion rather than edit wars and threats. Thanks. -- Schapel (talk) 13:52, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Dear I don't pretend to do anything you said. I removed the non-proved statement about Netscape success before you removed the Opera addition I made. Your proof argument is not enough, normal people don't switch browsers because of internal JS / API codes - they don't even know what it's. "one of your comments says you will remove Firefox from Wikipedia" what?? where??? So, I looked at your contributions and just because you edit a lot Mozilla / Firefox / Gecko can I say you have an agenda too? --Rafaelluik (talk) 03:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. I'll go ahead and report you to an admin. -- Schapel (talk) 03:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

You're being discussed by administrators
Hello Rafaelluik. You're being discussed at the edit-warring noticeboard: WP:AN3. You may still be able to avoid sanctions if you respond there and explain your edits. (The history shows five reverts by you of the same thing at Mozilla since 20 November):

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC


 * 1) 18:10, 20 November 2010  (edit summary: "remove opinion stated as factÂ² ;)")
 * 2) 02:09, 24 November 2010  (edit summary: "Undid revision 397933700 by Schapel (talk)")
 * 3) 22:23, 24 November 2010  (edit summary: "Undid revision 398626188 by Schapel (talk) "Netscape browser initially implemented many features not available in other browsers" = opinion, not fact.")
 * 4) 00:50, 26 November 2010  (edit summary: "Undid revision 398716887 by Schapel (talk) I can continue to undo your undo for all over the eternity until you can prove the statement. PS: What's an agenda?")
 * 5) 03:36, 28 November 2010  (edit summary: "Undid revision 398961323 by Schapel (talk) Give me a comparaive table and evidences that "Netscape implemented many features first" and I'll stop. You just can't prove it.")

Your statement "I can continue to undo your undo for all over the eternity" is contrary to our policy on WP:Edit warring. We expect that editors will discuss controversial changes and try to find consensus, before reverting again. I have not yet reviewed Schapel's edits. Perhaps you can help to explain the situation. Thank you, -- EdJohnston (talk) 05:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * How can I edit there if I'm blocked? Is everyone on Wikipedia stupid? Look, he has no proof of "Because the Netscape browser initially implemented many features not available in other browsers" that's why I'm trying to remove it. The information doesn't even meant to the theme of the article... And the worst: the admin that blocked me is an Mozilla Firefox user... Is this really happening? Can Wikipedia be monopolized by the opinion of certain admins / editors??? --Rafaelluik (talk) 23:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Mozilla. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   15:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC) During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HJ Mitchell (talk • contribs)

Pokémon Black 2 and White 2 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokémon Black 2 and White 2. Since you had some involvement with the Pokémon Black 2 and White 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Rafaelluik (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=569234452 your edit] to History of the Opera web browser may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:26, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * the user clicks on the eyes, a JavaScript alert will read "Because just passing is not enough ; ". (Screenshots: 1 [http://files.myopera.
 * Included in this release were the reintroduction of the 'rocker' browser controls (left-click - right-click = forward, right-click -  left-click = back).  Pinned Tabs, The option to start Opera to a homepage, the speed dial page, or

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)