User talk:Rastionay

How to
How to discuss what seems wrong in article? —Rastionay (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like you were editing Sun Yat-sen. You can discuss changes for the article at Talk:Sun Yat-sen. Every article has a talk page where you can discuss improving the article. -- ferret (talk) 18:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! —Rastionay (talk) 18:35, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sun Yat-sen has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sun Yat-sen was changed by Rastionay (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95827 on 2016-11-22T18:11:05+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sun Yat-sen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 18:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Sun Yat-sen. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 18:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

OK. Edit after discussion. Thanks. —Rastionay (talk) 18:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)