User talk:Rdunn

um...
I don't think my comment was uncivil--the talk page is long, and basically unreadable. However, I do think that editing other people's talk page comments isn't a good idea. Please refrain from it in the future--if you have a problem with a comment someone's made, why not contact them before editing it out? --Akhilleus (talk) 14:00, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * it was not the best thing for you to write when everyone is so heated. rdunn  albatross  14:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps that's true, but editing other people's talk page comments is usually not a way to make things calmer either. --Akhilleus (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I apologise then. the rules about editing talk comments conflict with the civil rules so I felt it best so that the talk page doesnt desend into a slanging match. rdunn  albatross  14:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

UAA
Hi, thanks for the report. Vandalism, however, is not reported at UAA (which deals with promotional, disruptive, offensive, and misleading usernames. Would you mind moving the report over to AIV?


 * reason: vandalism only account rdunn  albatross  07:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:24, 12

October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks,  ceran  thor 12:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)


 * woops. rdunn  albatross  12:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, that was a fail? Heh, =)  ceran  thor 13:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi - I've added the flag for you. Please review WP:ROLLBACK if you haven't already so you are clear on when (and more importantly when not!) to use the tool. Please feel free to ask me if you need any help. Thanks for your hard work on Wikipedia. Pedro : Chat  13:11, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
For moving that post from my userpage to my talk page. It's appreciated. :) --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 13:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

thank you
moved from user:ikip
 * == Article Rescue Squadron newsletter on User talk Bb515200000001‎ ==

you placed a copy of the ARS newsletter on User talk:Bb515200000001‎. I ould like to point out that he was indef blocked in march. rdunn albatross  12:21, 22 January 2010 (UTC)



Trading card game
The Trading card game project needs your help in choosing the rules, which is essential for developing everything else of the game. Please consider !voting for a set of rules here. You may voice your opinion about a particular set here. Also, if you have a new idea on what the rules could be, you are encouraged to propose a new set of rules (instructions can be found at the !voting page). Thank you, ♠  TomasBat   02:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Note: You are receiving this message because you signed your name at the project's list of members.

Wikipedia:Trading card game
We're wrapping up the democratic rules approval process. Please see Wikipedia:Trading card game/Action plan/Phase 1:Rules/Rules approval‎ and review the ruleset. If no changes are made to it within 7 days, then we will proceed next week with the card nomination and approval process.

If you are no longer interested in helping out with the project, please remove your name from the participants list.

Thanks! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:53, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

User category proposed deletion
You may be interested in Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 21. It is proposed to delete this category. SpinningSpark 16:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)