User talk:Reuben

This user edits as a wiki-sloth: my watchlist is completely empty, and I'll be happy to let you win any arguments. Archives are here: User_talk:Reuben/Archive/Archive_01.

Korea under Japanese Rule
Please redirect me as you see this fit. I'm new to Wiki editing.

In my humble opinion, the article [Korea under Japanese Rule] describes an EVENT and is not a history pertaining to any specific country.

To describe the event in which one Empire "A" subjugates a sovereign state "B" would be better described as "A's occupation B" as opposed to a "B under A's rule."

To draw a parallel, the article about France during World War II would be titled "France under German Rule" but this is not so.

The closest article to this topic is titled "German military administration in occupied France during World War II." However, the article is not an EVENT article. The article is titled in such a way because it describes the German military's activity while it occupied France during WWII. The title simply describes the content.

The title, as it currently stands, is misleading because it describes the subjugate relationship from Korea to Japan during a specific period as opposed to the event itself.

The problem with describing a relationship can be described as coercive or cooperative - a highly subjective process which would be difficult to maintain impartiality.

As it currently stands, the title is partial to the Japanese perspective that, by the word of the international law, Korea was under the Japanese rule because the head of the state had signed a treaty saying so. From the Korean perspective, Eulsa Treaty was forced at gunpoint and as such is void and null and there is evidence to support that point of view as well.

To describe the event objectively, I would humbly request that we consider changing the title more in line with the rest of "Japanese occupation" articles.

"Japanese Occupation of Korea" is a more objective title for the event which this article describes.

If the article was meant to describe the history as it relates to Japanese governance in occupied Korea, then I suggest the title of "Japanese Administration of Occupied Korea" and to revise the article as such.

If the article was meant to describe the history as it relates to Korea during this same time, then I would suggest the title of "Korean reaction to the Japanese Occupation" and to revise the article as such.

Again, please feel free to let me know if this was an inappropriate post. Tofoo (talk) 22:52, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Sandberg prize
I don't know if you are here, but I've kind of answered your question at Notice_board_for_Israel-related_topics. trespassers william (talk) 15:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Khasan-Tumangang line
When this line was build? according to one source, during ww2 in order to transport soviet troops to korea to fight the japanese. second source says "the railway was completed during the korean war". what is the correct? Superzohar Talk 11:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Chinese cash
You have previously participated in discussions on use of English in currency names at Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Numismatics/Style. If you care, please discuss a resolution of related titleing issue at Talk:Chinese wén. —  AjaxSmack   01:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Pongdong-ri
Pongdong-ri- check this. new missle site. Superzohar Talk 14:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:36, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:31, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:58, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:47, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians
Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive and create a worklist at WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Deep column station for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deep column station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deep column station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coin945 (talk) 08:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)