User talk:Rfernand

Welcome to the Wikipedia!
Hello, and Welcome to the Wikipedia, Rfernand! Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:


 * Take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial and Manual of Style.
 * When you have time, you can peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia, and assume good faith, but keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
 * Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
 * If you need any help, post your question at the Help Desk.
 * Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

And some odds and ends: Boilerplate text, Brilliant prose, Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Utilities, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes: &#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;.

Best of luck, Rfernand, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 05:17, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:OVO-limited.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:OVO-limited.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 01:06, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Warnings
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! — Alex (T 21:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

For love of the game
Your article, For Love Of The Game has been changed to a redirect, as an article on the movie with proper case already existed ( For Love of the Game ). -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 22:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Layout
Please bold the name of an article's topic in the article body, like I did here. Also, see the Guide to layout for more info. Cheers and happy editing! --Kchase02 (T) 04:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Sources required
As a self-professed Wikipedian from Mexico, please help to find sources for in order to make a verifiable encyclopaedia article about the concept. See chav for how such articles should be sourced. Uncle G 12:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of El Fundi


A tag has been placed on El Fundi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Cornell & Diehl for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cornell & Diehl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cornell & Diehl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lennart97 (talk) 12:36, 15 November 2021 (UTC)