User talk:Riick

Welcome to my user page!

To leave a message: You do not need a Wikipedia account to leave me a message.
 * 1) Click "New section" (above).
 * 2) Type subject and message.
 * 3) Click the "Save page" button.

Or, to add to a message, go to the message and then click [edit] to the right of the subject heading.

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Yancyfry
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Missing article
I have corrected the link in the discussion of fibre to the x, if you don't want to register, look it up in the Google cache as suggested. --Cgbraschi 09:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks and revert question
Please see my reply on my talk page. (I like to keep a thread together.) &#9679;DanMS • Talk 00:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

(That thread is now located here.) Riick (talk) 16:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Got your message
Just got your message about passivity on my talk page (I use many IPs, so it took a while before I saw it). I had posted an apology on the talk page of passive component a while ago. You're right that the comments were inappropriate.

On a related/unrelated note, I would propose that we consolidate passive component and active component into a single page called "passivity" with redirects from both. Active component simply means "not passive" and replicating content between both seems like a lot of unnecessary and error-prone work. I'm not actually sure about how to go about doing that (either technically or politically). 128.30.16.209 20:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Chemical Sensitivity redirect
See here for complete discussion. (This page contained an incomplete duplication of that discussion.) Riick (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC) updated by Riick (talk) 20:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Mhoon Landing Ship
Hi there, got your message on Panoramio. I'd be happy to share the Jubilee photos with you. I have several and may be able to dig up a few I took on the ship. Here's the one you requested.. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jubilee_at_Mhoon_Landing.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fujoshi (talk • contribs) 22:39, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Fantastic! I have put it in the article. But I don't think it was ever called the Jubilee: more about this on on the photo page. At any rate, I am so glad that you posted this! And you should have seen me when I first stumbled across it on Google a while back; it really made my day! If you feel like digging up the others I'd certainly love to see them. I could put them the gallery at the end of the article. Riick (talk) 06:14, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Naushon!
Love the Naushon page. It's my second favorite SA ferry of my lifetime (grated, both the Nobska and the Naushon were when I was a little kid, but perhaps that is part of it). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmjames (talk • contribs) 16:58, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Wmjames. I've been enjoying all your work on the Nobska page. Great NPS photo you found. The Nobska was just a little before my time, although I was present when they pulled it away to take it to Baltimore. (We may still have photos or super-8 of the event, although if I remember correctly it centers on us kids rather than on the steamer.) And yes, the SS Naushon was really neat; so many interesting spaces for a kid to explore! I'm very glad and NantoLeb were so generous with their photos! Riick (talk) 19:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I wish I had access to some better Nobska photos, but I don't (there are some online, but the articles look better with a few good ones in the article). At least I could put up one from the NPS. I have a memory of being on the Naushon and being just inside the jetties as they were towing out the Nobska with a tugboat, and there were people on it. Seems odd it had a tugboat, so I'm not sure of the accuracy of this mental image. Wait, you wrote, "pulled it away." Huh. Maybe I actually remember it accurately. Ah, nostalgia. They were pretty old boats, that is certain. I like the Eagle, it's big enough to be stately, but I still don't know about the somewhat recent renovations to the current Nantucket, it doesn't look the same. (Ok I need to remember to "sign" this this time...) --Wmjames (talk) 03:29, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

In fact I remember the tugboat as being of the little red stereotypical kind. I think the Eagles appearance mimics the Naushons in a lot of ways; perhaps on purpose? And finally, don't forget that the M/V Nantuckets changes are tame compared with the Uncatenas final renovations! (If you haven't seen that one yet, you will doubt me at first... and then your jaw will drop to the floor!!) Riick (talk) 05:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Wow!!!! *That's* the Uncatena?!?!? I... wow. I kinda liked the old Uncatena in some ugly duckling way. I remember reading the the SA cut it in half and lengthened it when they bought it, but that's nuts. Well at least it's still floating. Seems a lot of old boats end up as casinos, weird (although there is probably little to be done with a big boat that isn't so seaworthy anymore). I think the Eagle bridge looks old school, which is nice, although I can't explain what it is about it that makes me think that. --Wmjames (talk) 15:24, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for posting that ! I agree about the Eagle's bridge. A boxy narrow pilothouse with small windows and a railing; it's a very old-school style! Now compare the top two levels of and the Eagle. See any similarity? Riick (talk) 04:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Love it! Oh more photos to look at... --Wmjames (talk) 14:41, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Hermann's paper on entropy
I just wanted to say thanks for pointing out the paper "Entropy from the beginning" (mentioned in Talk:Heat) - I thought it was extremely useful and very enjoyable. David Hollman (Talk) 08:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Yeah isn't that wild? That paper absolutely blew me away. Of course, one oddity about thinking of heat as entropy is that this would mean more "heat" would enter a cold object than had left the warm one! But maybe I'm just too used to thinking of heat as energy rather than than as the force-driven entity responsible for that energy. Perhaps someone who was just learning these concepts would find that detail somewhat less strange? At any rate, the whole thing is a really intriguing idea. I certainly appreciate your postive feedback! Riick (talk) 14:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks …
… for, was my mistake. :) Amalthea  00:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem; always happy to fix typos. Thanks for making the template in the first place; it's really helpful! Riick (talk) 15:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Confidentiality
Thanks for the advice, I deleted only for the fact my IP address was conspicuous as I wasn't logged in. But appreciated for future reference.

Dairyintheillawarra (talk) 01:45, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Carly

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)