User talk:RobbieM13

About Korean language
Hello RobbieM13 I have had conversation with people from New Zealand (kiwi) and Australia who have Chinese ancestor, but I was surprised that they over-reacted and did not wish that Korean language belong to altaic language family. That's because Chinese people have so long been ruled by people who used altaic language family. However, personal emotion and scholastic work is separate thing.

The text books used in elementary, middle, and high school in South Korea still define that Korean language is part of altaic language family, in part, because there aren't many scholars who claim that Korean language is an isolated language. If South Korea does so, English wikipedia citing books from no linguistic background and listing different information will make the site like Galapagos Islands, and give wrong information to many people.

Also, I have a vovin book that was referenced, the referred content was not found in the book. Please understand that false information was disguised as true fact, citing a book that doesn't even have particular content. YOU MUST CHECK IT. IT IS REALLY WRITTEN LIKE THAT OR NOT. You can search about the book that Vovin wrote. It's about middle mongolian. And He wrote that the gender agreement is abandon in middle mongolian language.

Looking at the false contents that contains ideology of certain ethnic group, the English wikipedia users and the management in wikipedia should be ashamed and look back on their mistake. Thank you. --218.149.108.165 (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Replied to on Korean Language talk page.

Hi Robbie,

After I reverted your edit as POV, I realized what you meant about Altaic, which is of course correct. But the wording (using both 'controversial' and 'discredited') gave the impression of POV-pushing, so I then tried "The proposal that Koreanic in turn belongs to the largely discredited Altaic language family is no longer supported by academic research." Does that adequately convey what you wanted to say?

As for Korean being an isolate or Koreanic, that is again a POV issue. Saying both makes it look like there's some controversy there, which there is not. It's an isolate today (unless you accept the e.g. Unesco classification of Jeju as a separate language), but AFAIK no-one denies that it was related to at least some of the extinct languages of the Korean peninsula. Thus it is Koreanic regardless of whether it's an isolate today. For other languages that are the last surviving members of their family, we don't use split identification in the info box, we simply give the family and usually say something in the text about it being the last surviving member. — kwami (talk) 21:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Replied to on User Kwamikagami's talk page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederik Willem van Eeden (amateur botanist) has been accepted
 Frederik Willem van Eeden (amateur botanist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Theroadislong (talk) 18:48, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Frederik_Willem_van_Eeden_(amateur_botanist) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Van Eeden
Thank you for your excellent work in setting up a solid foundation for Frederick Willem Can Eeden's page! I have a good bit of information on him stashed away, but I currently have exams which will keep me busy for the next month or so - afterwards, however, I'd be happy to contribute what I've learned. Thanks again for your work! DeliriousWolf (talk) 09:13, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Extracorporeal shockwave therapy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acoustic ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Extracorporeal_shockwave_therapy check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Extracorporeal_shockwave_therapy?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

DRN Volunteer Roll Call - Action Required
There has been no roll call since November 2017 so with that said, it is time to clean up the volunteer list. Please go to the Roll Call list and follow the instructions. If no response is received by May 30, 2020, it will be assumed that you no longer wish to participate and you will be removed as a DRN volunteer. Thank you for your attention to this and for helping Wikipedians in their dispute processes. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of CVU Member \ Chat Me Up at 12:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)