User talk:Rogerbrent

request to modify NMOS cascode amplifier figure
Hi, Rogerbrent.

I'm not an expert, but it appears that Figure 1 in Cascode (File:NMOS-cascode.png) is a mix of small signal and large signal models -- specifically, the gate to the upper FET is actually biased, and is not tied to ground; FYI, if the model were small signal consistent, the power supply would be ground as well.

For new users, who are going to the Wiki to find out about Cascode arrangements, they expect to see the actual circuit, not a mixed circuit for analysis -- having that upper FET gate grounded is confusing.

Are you OK with changing (or allowing others to change) the figure to show a bias voltage on the upper FET?

WhackTheWiki (talk) 12:13, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Figure 1 in the Miller Effect
I see you created the image for the miller effect derivation, if you look at the original source however, the Av is actually stated as -Av. This is very important in the derivation, I was wondering if it were possible for you to change it, thanks.


 * Hi. When the article was first written, there wasn't a negative sign attached to $$A_V$$. This seems to be consistent with Miller's original definition of the gain of a tube in his paper (the first page of the document you link to is a paraphrased summary). Personally I preferred the previous terminology, but you are right that the article has become inconsistent. We should discuss this further on the Miller effect talk page. -Roger (talk) 19:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Deletion from commons
Hi Roger, the Miller effect article was off my watchlist for some time so I missed this question from you. Sorry for the late reply. The deletion is a bit inexplicable in this case, but often the problem is a botched move from Wikipedia to Commons. The trouble here is that if Commons has a problem with an image for whatever reason, they might inform the person who uploaded it locally on Commons but they never bother to inform the original creator on Wikipedia so you can entirely miss it had a problem, you will entirely miss it being deleted, and, since a bot comes round afterwards and removes the redlink in the article where the image used to be, you might entirely miss that the article ever had an image in the first place.

On images I upload to Wikipedia I always add keeplocal which should stop admins deleting the Wikipedia local copy if the image gets moved to Commons. It then does not matter what Commons do with their copy of the file, the Wikipedia article will always show the Wikipedia local copy. Occassionally I need to remind admins to look for the KeepLocal template before deleting but generally this works well.

Your alternative is to keep an account on Commons and make sure all your images are on your watchlist there so you get warned if there is an issue. This is a bit messy however - you need to watchlist the originals on Wikipedia as well so you can see when they get moved to Commons. You then need to go over to Commons and manually put them on your watchlist there as this does not happen automatically. If you are going to maintain a Commons account and watchlist, for new images you create it would be simpler to upload them to Commons directly rather than Wikipedia, but personally, I would rather keep everything on Wikipedia where it is easier monitor.  Spinning Spark  09:35, 22 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the explanation Spark! I'll keep that in mind next time I upload an image. -Roger (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

GA of voltage doubler
Hi Roger, would you mind taking a look at Talk:Voltage doubler/GA1. The reviewer has an issue with the article scope and I would be grateful if you could weigh in with an expert opinion. Thanks,  Spinning Spark  09:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Voltage doubler
You have been referred to at Good article reassessment/Voltage doubler/1  Spinning Spark  19:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Examples of convolution
I saw the wiki page, but I couldn't find any examples using actual numbers evaluating the formula. Could you give some examples of convolution, please? Mathijs Krijzer (talk) 22:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Definition
The convolution of f and g is written f∗g, using an asterisk or star. It is defined as the integral of the product of the two functions after one is reversed and shifted. As such, it is a particular kind of integral transform:




 * $$(f * g )(t)\ \ \,$$
 * $$\stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(\tau)\, g(t - \tau)\, d\tau$$
 * $$= \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(t-\tau)\, g(\tau)\, d\tau.$$      (commutativity)
 * }
 * $$= \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(t-\tau)\, g(\tau)\, d\tau.$$      (commutativity)
 * }

Domain of definition
The convolution of two complex-valued functions on Rd
 * $$(f*g)(x) = \int_{\mathbf{R}^d}f(y)g(x-y)\,dy$$

is well-defined only if f and g decay sufficiently rapidly at infinity in order for the integral to exist. Conditions for the existence of the convolution may be tricky, since a blow-up in g at infinity can be easily offset by sufficiently rapid decay in f. The question of existence thus may involve different conditions on f and g.

Circular discrete convolution
When a function gN is periodic, with period N, then for functions, f, such that f∗gN exists, the convolution is also periodic and identical to:


 * $$(f * g_N)[n] \equiv \sum_{m=0}^{N-1} \left(\sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty {f}[m+kN] \right) g_N[n-m].\,$$

Circular convolution
When a function gT is periodic, with period T, then for functions, f, such that f∗gT exists, the convolution is also periodic and identical to:


 * $$(f * g_T)(t) \equiv \int_{t_0}^{t_0+T} \left[\sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty f(\tau + kT)\right] g_T(t - \tau)\, d\tau,$$

where to is an arbitrary choice. The summation is called a periodic summation of the function f.

Discrete convolution
For complex-valued functions f, g defined on the set Z of integers, the discrete convolution of f and g is given by:


 * $$(f * g)[n]\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ \sum_{m=-\infty}^\infty f[m]\, g[n - m]$$
 * $$= \sum_{m=-\infty}^\infty f[n-m]\, g[m].$$      (commutativity)

When multiplying two polynomials, the coefficients of the product are given by the convolution of the original coefficient sequences, extended with zeros where necessary to avoid undefined terms; this is known as the Cauchy product of the coefficients of the two polynomials.

Files missing description details
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as: are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Rc divider.png
 * File:Amplifier loading.png
 * File:Impedance Voltage divider.png

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:08, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Warning box question
Roger, I am new to Wikipedia editing as of about a month. I have done quite a bit of work on Radio transmitter design and notice you have worked on it in the past. My question is what is the procedure for getting rid of the "multiple issues" box at the top of the article? I think I have addressed some of those issues and will try to address more if needed. Is there some automatic process for assessing the continued need for the warning box? Are editors free to delete it if they think the issue is resolved? Thanks for any help. JNRSTANLEY (talk) 14:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Hey, You can remove it if you think you've addressed the issues mentioned. Nice work BTW, though I still feel like the article isn't quite there yet. -Roger (talk)


 * Thanks for the encouragement and also the info on how the warning boxes work. I will do a bit more.   So far no blow-back on any of my edits, so I am gradually becoming more "bold". JNRSTANLEY (talk) 13:03, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Good luck! I'll try to get more involved in the article again and see if I can help get it in a better state. -Roger (talk)

Asymptotic gain model
Hi,

I see on the wiki page that you reference Rosenstark's 1972 paper and you also reference Middlebrook's 1964 paper. I have tried to locate Middlebrook's paper to see if he has this asymptotic gain model but I cannot locate it. Do you have a copy available that I could see. Johnseecg (talk) 20:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Hey. Sorry, I don't think I have a copy of that paper (and I'm not sure if I added that particular reference). Rosenstark's 1986 book does cover it though, so I can only attest to that reference. He might have coined the term actually. Middlebrook's extra element theorem generalizes it, but I believe his first paper on the subject was in 1989. -Roger (talk) 20:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

I was able to locate that paper and Middlebrook does have the asymptotic gain model in it so I believe that the 1964 paper is the first publication of that model. It is a tough reference to find though. I expect that Rosenstark developed it independently in 1972. Johnseecg (talk) 09:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Asymt feedback.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Common Collector.png


The file File:Common Collector.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphan file, not needed since there's a better SVG version at c:File:NPN emitter follower.svg"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ghouston (talk) 03:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Rogerbrent! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diagonal matrix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hadamard product. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)