User talk:Rosenborg BK Fan

Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. GiantSnowman 18:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your unbiased, civil, and polite block. Good luck on blocking other users like me. Rosenborg BK Fan (talk) 19:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I would like to request a permanent deletion of my user page, if possible. Unfortunately, I cannot do that on my own now (I presume you are very happy about it, as you should, of course). Otherwise, you have my word that from this point forth I am permanently withdrawn from this project as an editor (and that I won't create additional accounts here at all) and that I won't appeal for an unblock ever again. But, I'd really like that complete blanking of my user page and of my talk page afterwards, if possible (and, since you are an admin with extended powers and an unbiased, just authority here, I truly think you have the needed power to do that, if it's not to much that I'm asking after all, after 7 years of being here - that's all I am asking in return please). Thank you very much in advance and happy blocking in the future as well! Rosenborg BK Fan (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * At the same time, delete all my Wikipedia Commons uploads as as soon as you can, just as quick and efficient as you decided to block me. Rosenborg BK Fan (talk) 11:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * And in some rare cases, I read that even a talk page can be permanently deleted. You can do that as well (it's not that difficult, only if you have bad will, and I think I deserve that rare case status, if you don't mind, given that I edited here for nearly 10 years - which I tremendously regret now). Rosenborg BK Fan (talk) 11:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * But please make sure to do that after you delete all my uploads (which you should give you a lot of satisfaction, naturally). Rosenborg BK Fan (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

is declined. The user needs to make their request here. They are well advised to thoroughly read and understand WP:GAB before doing so; the request they made at UTRS was almost offensively bad. --Yamla (talk) 19:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


 * That's very kind of you. Thank you very much! Rosenborg BK Fan (talk) 19:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Would also be as kind as to permanently erase my user page because I have no use for it anymore now. I would do it myself, but I am not able to do it now (or ever in the future for that matter). You also have my word that I am permanently withdrawn from this project as an editor and that I won't create additional accounts here at all (I don't want to have anything to do with Wikipedia from this point forth, as a matter of fact). I'd be very grateful to you or anyone else who would do that. Thank you very much in advance! Rosenborg BK Fan (talk) 19:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I've deleted your userpage per your request. Your Talk page cannot - and will not - be deleted. However, you are welcome to blank it, including this message.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:36, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, thank you very much! I am very satisfied now. Happy blocking in the future with other users! Rosenborg BK Fan (talk) 19:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I just read your response where you all allied to block me, you hypocritical liar. I did not mean all of you are doomed, but rather that this project is doomed, but obviously you don't have the minimum intellectual capacity nor the emotional intelligence to understand that (how would you after all, considering your tremendous bad will, along with your authoritarian acolytes). Next time you intend to lie, at least quote exactly what users wrote (exactly the way the did if you are able to do it as quick as you are able to repeal an appeal which I shouldn't have made). In another more practical order of ideas, you have my utmost sincere word that from this point forth all my support for this fake project that you (and others like or similar to you) turned into is inexistent! That includes all my Wikimedia uploads which I want deleted as soon as possible, just as quick as you can block someone because that's the only thing you can do quick and seemingly 'right' (or repeal a regretted appeal on that decision for that matter). I really regret appealing for that block decision in the first place as well (it was a waste of my time) but it was my right anyway (one which you can't take away, regardless of how much you might want to). If you want a sincere opinion, I don't even care if those of you who blocked me are to be doomed (that's your problem). I really regret wasting part of my last 7 years here, I should've known better! But we all do mistakes, after all...
 * This is exactly what was written by me, not your stupid flawed joke of an interpretation: 'And if you are the same like them, this is just goes to show how authoritarianism will doom this free project.' It wasn't even remotely connected to you (whether you want to admit or not, or like it or not as well for that matter). Authoritarianism of any kind, mind you. Instead of blocking me or other users (now it's too late but anyway), go and fix the graphs, go and add meaningful content, go an polish sections which have affiliated banners stating things need to be mended up. Because if you would be more concerned with this, then Wikipedia won't look the way it does (but you don't care anyway)...
 * Continue to operate with reverts and deletion of content and proceed to a very limited activity here as well (doing a favour to former users like me in the process and who knows, readers as well). I want to make it clear that you are by no means any moral authority here considering your lie. You and others like or similar to you who operate with tremendous bad will and constant deletion of content because that is the only thing you can do best, the only, I mean it (that and blocking, of course, your most favourite thing). I am sick of your fake authority style which is just plain authoritarianism (in general, without any ethnic labels attached to it, happy?; there you have it). I am not as stupid as you think I am, nor were my edits of poor quality. But you wouldn't be able to understand that anyway (and that is not intended to you; be an envoy and carry the message to one of your acolytes). Last but not least, the culture of dialogue is null here, absolutely null, and that doesn't have anything to do with personal attacks of any sort (just your sick interpretation of them). And any normal culture of dialogue includes harsh criticism if need be as well, if you are democratically mature enough to understand this. Even if you don't like, that does not mean it's untrue.
 * Normally, I wouldn't have wanted to continue responding, you even didn't give me the chance but you won't admit it, just proceeded haphazardly to your seemingly 'nice' authoritarianism (which is not apparent, it's very real and should be very much concerning for other users), but your lie disgusted me. You might be almighty here in terms of user powers, but keep in mind that this project is tremendously flawed (and that's not personal opinion, it's fact). As for 'collaborative efforts', please give me a break regarding that as well (and that is not necessarily meant to you) and it won't be fixed by those who behave like you (and that is not a personal attack, that is the truth you don't want to accept). Rosenborg BK Fan (talk) 11:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Can we revdel this and replace it with some templates? Don't think this needs to be seen. I like Astatine (Talk to me) 14:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

is closed.
Further demonstration that this user is a a poor fit. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Rosenborg BK Fan. Thank you for your work on National Liberal Ecologist Alliance. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

is closed. User already knows this sort of request is inappropriate. --Yamla (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Swordedge


The article Swordedge has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability and no significant coverage available to use as references."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InDimensional (talk) 23:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)