User talk:Rosenzweig

Please use my talk page at the German wikipedia (in German, English or French)  Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~ ~ ~. Four tildes (~ ~ ) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 11:35, Nov 7, 2004 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Victoria Paris DOB
Luke Ford says 1965, as does the Adult Film Database, those were my sources (2:1). But I'm not set on it; her personal site doesn't say either way. If you want, we can put a sentence about the discrepancy in the article. AnonEMouse 23:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, let's do this. You do it here, I'll put a note in the German article. Regards --Rosenzweig 18:39,

15 May 2006 (UTC)

Commons
Hi, I just wanted to say you are absolutely right about the images, I just didnt know what tag to use. I'm sort of new to that. I didnt know I was doing anything wrong, but I know now, thanks to you. But, while you told me what not to do, you didnt really tell me what tags to use and how to upload it from commons. Do I need to become a user of commons to upload? Also, I thought I uploaded from the English Wikipedia... I've obviously made some mistakes, but how, exactly, do I fix them? Thanks for putting me in line, ÅñôñÿMôús Dîššíd3nt 20:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Weinsburg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 00:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh well. It is a common misspelling, so I wanted to provide a service. A redirect would indicate the spelling is correct, so I chose this instead. If this is not desirable here, I guess the readers of the English wikipedia will have to go uninformed. --Rosenzweig (talk) 00:47, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Winemaking cooperative
Hello, I saw that you removed a statement on the first German winemaking cooperative being in Ahr in 1869. In your edit summary you mentioned one in Neckarsulm in 1855. If you have a source for that, it would be very good if you could add it to the article! I took the statement about 1869 from the latest edition of Oxford Companion to Wine, which is generally considered an authorative source on everything related to wine. But perhaps the history of winemaking cooperatives is under-researched in relation to "sexier" aspects of the history of wine, in which case it would be good to have more accurate info in Wikipedia than in OCW. Regards, Tomas e (talk) 10:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The cooperative in question is the de:Weingärtnergenossenschaft Neckarsulm-Gundelsheim, which existed until 2007, when it merged with another cooperative in nearby Heilbronn (the de:Genossenschaftskellerei Heilbronn-Erlenbach-Weinsberg, to be precise). You can read German, I see, so I don't have to translate the articles for you. A source would be the book about the history of Neckarsulm: Neckarsulm. Die Geschichte einer Stadt, Hrsg. Stadt Neckarsulm, Konrad Theiss Verlag, Stuttgart 1992, ISBN 3-8062-0883-2. The book has a chapter about wine in Neckarsulm, written by Wolfgang Angerbauer (then-archivist of the Landkreis / district Heilbronn): Weinbau in Neckarsulm im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert on pp. 225 to 240. The founding of the Weingärtnergesellschaft in 1855 is mentioned on p. 228. An even better source might be the book by Otto Baer: Werden, Wachsen und Wirken der württembergischen Weingärtnergenossenschaften, Wiesbaden 1979 — but I don't have that book, so I can only speculate. Please note that apparently there were other cooperatives before the one in Neckarsulm, but they ceased to exist at some time, making the one in Neckarsulm the oldest one still in existence in Württemberg, until 2007. Now, the oldest still existing cooperative in Württemberg (and perhaps Germany) are the de:Fellbacher Weingärtner, I think, founded in 1858. You might also be interested in a historical overview of German winemaking cooperatives, online here. Regards --Rosenzweig (talk) 15:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello again, a much delayed thanks for your refs, which I now finally have used. I found the last one particularly useful (and reading it was no problem - I only hesitate to write in German), since it contained information which made it understandable why OCW had pointed out Ahr as the place of the first cooperative since it seems to be the oldest WG now in existence (perhaps by counting WGs with a formal basis?). Anyway, I now include both Neckarsulm and Mayschoß in the description. Tomas e (talk) 19:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Transferring images to Commons
Hi, I have a rather critical response to the remarks you made one my talkpage. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 19:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Chase Masterson
IP socks and brand-new never-edited-before account User:Scott Scott Hayden are edit-warring to restore bogus birthdate with bogus refs. I'm at 3RR, so I can't respond any further, although I've filed an SPI. If you get a chance, could you keep an eye on the artricle. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:37, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

File:McConico2.jpg
Just checking. Was this issue satisfactorily resolved? Thanks!  Austex •  Talk  15:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Rosenzweig, kannst du die IP, die du gerade revertiert hast, mal sperren lassen. Und vielleicht auch gleich Yulia Tymoshenko halbsperren. Ich würd es selbst machen lassen, muss aber offline gehen. --Túrelio (talk) 21:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ich war auch gleich danach weg, hatte das nur zufällig gesehen, weil ich Neue Dateien auf Commons angeklickt hatte. Scheint sich erledigt zu haben mit der IP, keine Edits mehr. Mit der hiesigen Sperrpolitik kenne ich mich nicht so aus, das lasse ich lieber. --Rosenzweig (talk) 10:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Designated Survivor
I would be glad to. You see, none of the Supreme Court Justices are in line to be President. --Njorent (talk) 19:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
 * And that is why you reverted my edit completely without any explanation whatsoever? The Speaker of the House and the President p.t. of the Senate are in the line of succession, and well before the HUD secretary. --Rosenzweig (talk) 19:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2021
Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page RAR. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should: Thank you. TJRC (talk) 17:16, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
 * Only add a " red link " if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references

uh...
Why did you enclose the word "unsourced" in your edit summary in this edit? Am I sensing a little attitude from you? I simply made a harmless mistake but you had to be (unnecessarily) snarky about it. A-hole. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 08:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It's a quote. Quotes are in quotation marks. That's it, nothing else. Now, do you want to apologize for the "A-hole", or do I have to report you? --Rosenzweig (talk) 12:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)