User talk:Rune370

Proposed deletion of playback (technique)


The article playback (technique) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not notable enough for a stand alone article"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Modanung
For your information: Modanung was blocked indefinitely at the german Wikipedia for his abusive behavior in trying to force his self-created image into the Chaosmagie article because of being a Single-Purpose Account and violating the No Original Research rule. I have no idea how the appropriate procedure here would work, but if you need any assistance get back to me. &mdash; viciarg 414 15:06, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring case opened against User:Modanung
Hiya. You might be interested in lending your voice on the edit warring case I opened against the aforementioned user. Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 12:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Tyw7, I'd be happy to lend my support. Where would you like me to leave the comment? On the page you linked to, or on the talk page for the German article? Or somewhere else? Rune370 (talk) 18:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * At the time of the comment, the page linked to. But apparently Mo had dug himself into a hole and is now permanently banned with talk page privileges revoked. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 18:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I've just seen that he's been banned. Thanks for your support, and your help reverting the disruptive edits, I appreciate it. Rune370 (talk) 18:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Chaos magic into Gnosis (chaos magic). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:44, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Servitor (chaos magic)
Hi, I'm Xevus11. Rune370, thanks for creating Servitor (chaos magic)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please avoid using citations/footnotes from other wikipedia pages, wikipedia is not considered a reliable source for other wikipedia pages. Additionally, please see how other article's structure their reference lists, such as on George Washington. Listing a footnotes and sources section separately is highly unusual.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Xevus11 (talk) 22:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Alright, it looks like I was just confused by the citation layout. The article looks great now, happy editing!Xevus11 (talk) 23:02, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Synchromysticism
Hi,

I'm really happy to see with your changes the page Synchromysticism was finally published... even if you didn't mention the contributions I made :-/

Perhaps one good turn deserves another? Could you help me with a pet project I'm volunteering for? We need some nuetral editing on artist page Jim Ricks. Much appreciated!

Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 18:10, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dave Lee (chaos magician)


The article Dave Lee (chaos magician) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This person doesn't meet our notability guidelines, and no secondary sources can be found. All existing sources are non reliable (chat logs, etc)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 21 July 2022 (UTC)