User talk:Rwils

WNNX/WWWQ
Hey, I have a question for you. You do realize that the call letters WWWQ are following Q100 over to 99.7fm, the WNNX call letters will be replaced by the new call letters of the new station that's premiering on 100.5fm right? Rwils (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Can you prove that? Have they said that somewhere, or are you guessing?


 * It's incredibly unlikely that Cumulus will use the WNNX calls on 100.5. Cumulus is trying to establish a new brand at 100.5 - and NNX stands for "ninety-nine x".  They're almost certainly going to obtain a new callsign for the station - one that actually relates to the new brand name. -- ChrisB (talk) 00:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. What I meant was that the call letters of WWWQ now licensed to the 100.5 frequency are to be moved over to the 99.7 frequency to replace the WNNX letters, this has been requested to the FCC. As of yet the new call letters for Rock 100 cannot be publicly revealed, but they will replace the call letters of WWWQ now licensed to the 100.5 frequency. So, my question is why are you moving around the history and information for WNNX and WWWQ? -- Rwils (talk) 03:18 on Sunday, January 27, 2008 (UTC/GMT)


 * Because Q100 is currently broadcasting on WNNX 99.7, so its relevant information belongs there, along with the history of the 99.7 frequency. It's no longer in both places because of Wiki guidelines about duplicate content - as its future is with 99.7, its history belongs there.  Once the callsigns are changed, the WNNX article will be moved in its entirety to WWWQ, and the current WWWQ article will be moved to the new callsign. -- ChrisB (talk) 06:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I removed the autoblock, you should be able to edit now. Mango juice talk 04:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey, 99X Online should have a page of its own since it is still an existing radio station online and on HD-2 right? --Rwils (talk) 01:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No. Per Wikipedia guidelines: not every subject warrants its own article, and the topic is already appropriately covered on WWWQ.  The current version of 99x is not notable enough to deserve its own article. -- ChrisB (talk) 05:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Callsign flip
I'm fully aware of the change. But Wikipedia guidelines specifically prohibit just swapping the content of two articles via cut and paste: WP:CPMV. All we need is an admin to swap the two pages, and we'll be good to go. -- ChrisB (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WCNN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WIFN ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/WCNN check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/WCNN?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Your recent editing history at Kimberly Klacik shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Honestly, I was not aware of this. No problem. Just don’t want to see someone in the public eye, particularly in public political elections or office being attacked by unfair means to them. I’m opting out of any involvement in this particular Wikipedia article.

I just read the Wikipedia article on protection policy, can that be applied to the page?

Disambiguation link notification for January 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bill Todman Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grandma's Boy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Opps, my mistake it was supposed to be linked to his Wikipedia page. Rwils (talk) 23:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, because as it says “ In 2003, Todman and Edward L. Milstein formed Level 1 Entertainment. Together, they have produced and financed such motion pictures as Grandma's Boy for 20th Century Fox, Rendition for New Line Cinema, and Strange Wilderness for Paramount Pictures.” Rwils (talk) 00:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 7-Eleven, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irving.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I meant to point it to the Irving, Texas page. Rwils (talk) 04:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)