User talk:SONORAMA

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! D. J. Bracey (talk) 01:16, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Weekday Religious Education
Thanks for updating the link at Weekday Religious Education. The source was valid at one time, but it appears the website's domain name registration has expired and, as is unfortunately customary, has been replaced by an ad site. I'll try to see if an archived version of the original site exists somewhere online. -- JeffBillman (talk) 03:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. richi (talk) 20:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't disagree with your POV, but it is just that: a POV. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a manual for social services staff. However, if you can find citations where observer express this POV, it would be appropriate for an encyclopedia to note these views ... richi (talk) 10:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Additions to "Fuel economy-maximizing behaviors" article
We are trying to source all the material for the article on "Fuel economy-maximizing behaviors", since the topics are controversial. Please add sources for your unreferenced additions, or they may be deleted. Thanks, --Mikiemike (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Carol Morgan School
A tag has been placed on Carol Morgan School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

RE: Jason O'Toole Deletion Contested
I've restored the history of the article. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Deleting my source
Would you mind telling me why you chose to delete the sources I had for my edits on the K-1 Visa article? They were legitimate sources, and given the history directly above this paragraph, where they restored the history of an article that you allegedly deleted completely, I'd say you're just out to make reasonable Wiki editors' lives difficult, so stop.Wikieditor1988 (talk) 21:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warren Doyle (March 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

The comment they left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warren Doyle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Warren_Doyle Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LaMona&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Warren_Doyle reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 04:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Warren Doyle


Hello, SONORAMA. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Warren Doyle".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * On the International Justice Mission page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=753224726 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F753224726%7CInternational Justice Mission%5D%5D Ask for help])

TSO
May I ask, are you in any way connected to the band you keep trying to add to their page? Either way please see our rule on coatracking and proper sources as these may show more details on why your addition is inappropriate. 204.232.72.72 (talk) 14:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited International Justice Mission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Empower ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/International_Justice_Mission check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/International_Justice_Mission?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from further reverts to Big Cat Rescue
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Big Cat Rescue. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Hipal (talk) 02:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

September 2022
Hello, I noticed that you changed content in the article on the town of Orania in South Africa. Please could you explain why you think your proposed wording is best at Talk:Orania. Please have a look at "Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle", which is an explanatory essay about the Wikipedia:Consensus and Wikipedia:Be bold pages. I think you will find it helpful because it explains Wikipedia policies. -- Toddy1 (talk) 19:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)