User talk:Saged

Fort McPherson
Hello Saged. I have reverted the edits you made today to Fort McPherson, because it appears you have taken them from a publication aimed either at soldiers/families posted to the place, or at people to entice them there. Either way, the result is not really helpful in an encyclopaedia. Nevertheless, i want to say Welcome, and please keep contributing. If i can help, visit my talk page and leave a message. Cheers, LindsayHi 20:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello Lindsay,

I work in the Fort McPherson Public Affairs Office and have been tasked to update this site. My office is responsible for disseminating all information about Fort McPherson, both internally and externally. All of the information that I have input onto this site was produced by this office in our Fort McPherson Installation Guide Book, which is hot off the press and will soon be uploaded onto our Web site. These guidebooks are distributed to newly arrived Soldiers and their families, new employees as well as any other individuals who are interested in obtaining information about Fort McPherson. These guide books are for purely informational purposes and are by no means being used to promote or entice people to come to Fort McPherson. I had assumed that it would be a good idea to post similar information from our guide book on this site for people who had any inquiries about Fort McPherson (it's history, it's services, it's intended date of closure and where all of the units are being dispersed under the Base Realignment and Closure Act (BRAC) etc.) to easily obtain this information. It's just a complete breakdown of what Fort McPherson is all about, and in a sense, isn't that the intent of an encyclopedia -- to provide correct and comprehensive information on a specific topic? My only intent is to inform anyone who is interested about the who, what and wheres of Fort McPherson. If you have any further inquiries, our Public Affairs Officer will be more than happy to speak with you. Her name is Terry Hines Smith, (404) 464-2446. Thank you for your time.
 * May i suggest you take a look at this page, which is a guideline about editing on a page where you may have a conflict of interest. I think it's pretty clear that if you "have been tasked" to edit the Wikipedia article about your place of employment there is a conflict of interest, a possible difference of goals between your employer and the encyclopaedia.
 * Secondly, if i may, i'll point out just a couple of things about how you edited ~ not, i assure you, for any other purpose than to help or guide you; my goal is just to improve Wikipedia, and get the best editors possible volunteering and editing here.
 * You wrote Whether you have already arrived, have recently received orders to report here or are visiting, the information in this publication is designed to help you get settled and learn about our on-post services and off-post opportunities. The general, but not invariable, practice is that articles are written in an impersonal manner, or in the third person, not the second person (you).  Also, this publication would refer to Wikipedia, and its design is not to help anyone settle anywhere.
 * The History section really didn't need to talk about Atlanta; that takes place in its article.
 * All the information about the housing is probably more detailed than necessary here. Also, the contact information in that section is inappropriate for an encyclopaedia.
 * Please don't take these criticisms badly or to heart. Please do continue editing; after all, you obviously have information about Fort McPherson that i don't access to from here.  And i'll bet that you can contribute in other articles, too, with other information you possess or can access. Cheers, LindsayHi 06:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:EdCtr.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:EdCtr.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:StaffRow2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:StaffRow2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Front Gate McPhersonp052505a-04.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Front Gate McPhersonp052505a-04.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:33, 25 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:33, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Image:Front Gate McPhersonp052505a-04.jpg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 16:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Seregionmap.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Seregionmap.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Quarters 10, Fort McPherson.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Quarters 10, Fort McPherson.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 12:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Staff Row at Fort McPherson.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Staff Row at Fort McPherson.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)