User talk:Sakretsu

Sourcing
Thanks for informing me on proper sourcing. +Rep Duskshadowbrony (talk) 02:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)DuskShadowBrony

Inappropriate Vandalism Report
As stated by the Vandalism guidelines:

"Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. Edit warring over content is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, detrimental but well-intentioned, and vandalizing. Mislabelling good-faith edits as vandalism can be considered harmful."

If you want to fight with me and debate these changes, that is fine, but I am genuinely attempting to improve this article, and I do not appreciate unwarrented attacks. I will continue to make edits, as I have the right to do, and will make efforts to follow the guidelines more closely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctom42 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Additionally: I just double checked, and my appeal about the bot targeting my edit as vandalism went through. It was accepted as a false positive. Please refrain from attempting to claim my actions are vandalism again, because they are not.Ctom42 (talk) 21:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Umineko Character List Edits
Hello, I would like to ask you to stop reverting my changes to the Umineko Character List page. That page contained information that was not appropriate for a simple character list, information which relied on personal interpretations of the story, information which spoiled major sections of the story, and information which was factually incorrect. The edited version removed things all these problem sections and was much more in line with character lists found in other places on Wikipedia. The previous page had spoiled the story for several readers, and the changes were made after many people complained about the page.Ctom42 (talk) 21:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

EDIT: I have read that article, and I did so even before deleting the content. The point is that most of that content does not belong on a character list page. If you look at character list pages for other works of fiction such as anime, visual novels, books, tv show, etc, they do not include such detailed information about plot twists. A character list page is supposed to contain basic information about characters, not "in episode 3 it was revealed that X" or things such as that. Additionally there is a large portion of content that is personal assumptions in several of the sections, as well as incorrect content.

The only places I could see that I could have potentially gone too far is with the complete removal of 2 characters (Lion and Yasu). That is the only place where spoilers were the sole reason for removal. Everything else was either information that did not belong on such a page or content that was not factual.

I will adjust my changes to no longer remove those two character, but otherwise I don't see that any of them are vandalism. The other changes should all be appropriate based on the guidelines about notability and writing about fiction. Spoilers were the results of this, but that itself was not the reason for removal. If there are any other specific removals you disagree with me on, feel free to discuss it, but simply undoing my changes outright is not acceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.237.103.7 (talk) 20:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU
Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 11:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Sakretsu. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Sakretsu~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Diffs:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Time Travel Shōjo: Mari Waka to 8-nin no Kagakusha-tachi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AT-X. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alderamin on the Sky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AT-X. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Portals
Hi! Can the infobox also include the decade portal? While the infobox does have the Anime and manga portal, the real reason behind this edit was to attach the portal of the relevant decade (Portal:2010s) WhisperToMe (talk) 16:12, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Nanbaka
Hey thanks for reverting my revert. I misjudged the diff way too fast and for some reason thought it was vandalism at the time. (I actually thought to myself "November doesn't have more than 28 days", yep...) I need to look much more carefully at diffs in the future. Opencooper (talk) 19:02, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Yuri On Ice genre
Hi there. Just wondering, why is the Anime News Network not considered a reliable source for indication that Yuri on Ice is a shonen-ai series? The website is used in a lot of other references, so are those not reliable either? ISD (talk) 18:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh I see. That's understandable then. ISD (talk) 21:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Just thought, this review mentions that the show is shonen-ai (scroll to the bottom). Is this good enough to be used as a source? ISD (talk) 18:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Umm, I need your help......some user call "UnknownUsername480" undid your edit and put that paragraph back on the top page. I left a message on his talk page to undo it and why, but I don't know if he'll do it. Only a few minutes has pass, but I letting you know in case this user doesn't undo it himself, since I'm anon and the page is locked. We're talking about it at the talk page right now.....And UnknownUsername480 isn't replying all or making his case.....Please revert his edit.68.11.91.158 (talk) 02:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

umaru discussion
What exactly constitutes as a seperate television series? If an Xth season of an anime does not, why do stuff like Blue Exorcist, High School DxD, Saekano, or Sword Art Online get placed in multiple categories? Avengingbandit 18:07, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for being so late, but any updates? You merely just stated that you were "adapting to the recent edits the members of the project have done", yet there's still a number of inconsistencies, like the series I mentioned right above. If "members of the project" are interested in consistency, why not just keep putting additional seasons of an anime series in additional categories? Because as far as I know, that's been the case up until recently. I'd also like to ask, what's the difference between a sequel and a second season? Avengingbandit 22:44, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

I dropped a question in the discussion you showed me. I don't see your name anywhere there, so I can assume it's not you that came up with such a rule? Avengingbandit 23:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)