User talk:SamEtches

Welcome
 Hello SamEtches, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

---Joe Chill SamEtches, good luck, and have fun. --Joe Chill (talk) 00:20, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

International Space Station
Thank you for the help with the link to the movie, if you can find any more, just pop them straight in. Thanks ! Penyulap  talk 15:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi SamEtches, can I call you Sam ? I probably gave poor advice, as I have since learnt that the encyclopedia type people don't really like pop culture(like media) sections generally. They make it pretty hard to understand too, like for Solaris, the ISS would belong in the Solaris article, explaining how the sets for the movie were based on the ISS, but Solaris doesn't belong in the ISS article because nothing about the ISS changed because of the movie Solaris. It's weird, but thats as best I can understand it. If one changed the other than it's 'notable' but if it had no effect it's 'not notable' and doesn't go in. First orbit gets mentioned because it was filmed on the iss, by a crew member, from the cupola module, so it effected the ISS. Does that make any sense ? Penyulap   talk 01:13, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Gangs of New York appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 02:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Unreferenced additions
Stop adding unreferenced, trivial content to articles. ---  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 03:38, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

The Fifth Element
Please do not change the year in which the film is set without providing a reliable source. Thank you. Doniago (talk) 06:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Fifth Element, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop changing the year without providing any explanation. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Fifth Element, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 20:49, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. When you recently edited Giant (1956 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Segregation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:31, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Brokeback Mountain, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Knowing (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Per above, you've been warned about doing this type of thing. Stop it, or you will eventually be blocked for editing in this way (whether it's a temporary or permanent block). Flyer22 (talk) 01:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armageddon (1998 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Mahon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent edits to the The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (film) plot summary because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 13:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

May 2014
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Waltzing Matilda. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 12:40, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Life of Pi (film), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 19:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Cloud Atlas (novel), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Edit summaries, multiple consecutive edits
Hello- Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric talk 11:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Please make a habit of providing an edit summary when you make a change to an article. Doing so makes it easier for your colleagues here to understand the intention of your edit.
 * Plus, it will be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits in rapid succession on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. This keeps the page history of the article less cluttered.

August 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Flight 19 does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Ditto for every other edit you've made on Wikipedia. Eric talk 02:54, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at RMS Olympic ‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 00:25, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Fail Safe (1964 film) does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Eric talk 01:58, 20 December 2017 (UTC)